The public flogging of veteran broadcast journalist Katie
Couric began on Dec. 4, 2013, immediately after a 17-minute report on HPV and
Gardasil vaccine was broadcast on her TV talk show “Katie.”1 It was
kick-started by a west coast business writer, who administered the first lash
with a bizarre take-down of freedom of the press:
“The real punch of the show was its portrayal of HPV
vaccination as “controversial,” he charged.” Merely to ask questions is to
validate them.” He ended with a sucker punch: “Katie Couric established her
credibility as a spokeswoman for preventive medicine more than a decade
ago...now she’ll be known for promoting junk medicine instead.”2
“Is Katie Couric
The Next Jenny McCarthy?”
Then, like piranhas in a fish tank full of fresh chum, an
online clique of mean girls and bully boys let Katie have it right between
the eyes.
“Is Katie Couric the next Jenny McCarthy?” sneered a headline
for an article in which a cub reporter sharpened her claws on Couric’s
credibility by hissing “The damage a former Playboy Bunny has been able to do
is bad enough. But Couric’s misdeeds are all the worse given that she’s taken
much more seriously than Jenny McCarthy.”3
Continuing with that lame theme, an entertainment writer stuck
it to Katie when she suggested that “To some, Couric's behavior is even more
problematic than McCarthy's, given her stature as a respected journalist and
former network news anchor, as well as her previous efforts to educate the
public about the fight against cancer.”4
One headline screamed “Katie Couric Hands Over Her Show to Anti-Vaccine Alarmists”5 and another one gasped “Why is Katie Couric Promoting Vaccine Skeptics?” followed by an article written by a photojournalist sniping that “Couric needs to review her priorities.”6
Katie Couric:
Presenting HPV Information & Perspective
Katie’s unforgiveable transgression? On her afternoon talk
show, she gave two mothers, who had witnessed their daughters’ health
suddenly deteriorate after Gardasil shots, an opportunity to speak about what
happened.7 8 She gave an
international HPV infection expert,9 who participated in
Gardasil vaccine clinical trial research, an opportunity to comment about the
effectiveness of Gardasil vaccine and the need for all girls – whether they
get vaccinated or not – to get regular pap screening.10 She gave a pediatrician an
opportunity to encourage parents to vaccinate their 11-year old boys and
girls because “HPV vaccine does not seem to be any risker than any of the
other vaccines we routinely use;” 11 12 and Katie gave a mother and
her daughter an opportunity to enthusiastically endorse the vaccine. 13
Katie Couric presented information and a range of perspectives
about a current topic being discussed by millions of parents and young women
in homes and doctors’ offices across the country. She did it because she is
an intellectually honest journalist, a compassionate mother and cancer
prevention pioneer. Fourteen years ago, Katie Couric almost single handedly
put a human face on the importance of colonoscopy screening, especially for
those at high risk when she publicly witnessed about the tragedy of losing
her husband and the father of her children to colon cancer. 14 After a long and successful
career in broadcast journalism, in 2006 she became the first woman to anchor
the evening news on a major U.S. TV network. 15
An Orchestrated
Campaign of Intimidation
The shaming of Katie Couric for caring and daring to ask
questions about Gardasil vaccine, was a well-orchestrated campaign of
intimidation. It was a warning delivered to all journalists that – no matter
who you are – your character will be assassinated if you
step out of line and question the safety or effectiveness of a government
recommended vaccine.
The cyber lynch mob 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 presenting opinion as
unassailable fact delighted in quoting each other and did not reserve their
vitriol for Katie. Two mothers on the show were ridiculed for describing
their daughters’ Gardasil vaccine reaction symptoms, which are similar to
those reported by many, many others in the U.S. and around the world.23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 The credentialed Gardasil
vaccine researcher 44 on the show was attacked for
stating that regular pap tests are the most reliable way of detecting and
preventing cervical cancer regardless of vaccination, a position held by
cancer prevention experts. 45 46 47
Katie Couric Encourages Informed Vaccine Decision Making
Two days after the public flogging began, Katie interviewed
the Assistant Surgeon General 48 before authoring an article
for The Huffington Post responding to the
firestorm with unapologetic professionalism. 49 She acknowledged her report
could have spent more time putting the statistical risk of suffering a
vaccine reaction into greater perspective but she defended the inclusion of
mothers reporting Gardasil reactions:
“Some people say their children have suffered from a
variety of medical problems after the HPV vaccination, and there have even
been a few reports of death,” she said. “As a journalist, I felt that we
couldn't simply ignore these reports. “
Katie reinforced a call for regular pap screening:
“There's been troubling research out of Australia that
indicates some women are skipping their Pap tests because they have been
vaccinated. That's a terrible idea. While the vaccine protects against some
of the HPV strains that cause cervical cancers, it doesn't protect against
all of them and regular Pap smears are essential for life-saving diagnoses,”
she said.
Katie concluded her statement by encouraging critical thinking
and informed vaccine decision-making:
“I had my own two daughters vaccinated against HPV. I hope
that other parents will look at the research and the facts, and make a
reasoned decision on the HPV vaccine and what is best for their children,”
she said.
“Not Enough” He Says
However, Katie’s clarification prompted one bully to bring out
the whip one more time. Under a headline complaining that “Katie Couric Backs
Off from Her Anti-Vaccine Show but Not Enough,” he snarled,
“The video depictions of mothers and daughters in tears will
stay with thousands of Couric's loyal viewers. Her written mea culpa, not so
much.” 50
Perhaps he wanted her to walk across cut glass on her knees
and wimper a little on camera so he could be convinced that she would be a
good girl from now on and never, ever step out of line again.
Mothers Will Not Stop Witnessing
One thing is as clear today as it was 32 years ago when
mothers publicly witnessed how they watched their children suffer brain
inflammation or die after being injected with the old, crude and toxic DPT
vaccine. 51 52 53 5455 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Clearly, when mothers stand up in the public square today and
describe how Gardasil vaccine risks for their daughters turned out to be 100
percent, deniers of vaccine risks get really, really emotional. They get
angry and defensive. They gather together in a pack, take out the rope and
start cyber-lynching.
Mothers around the world, who give birth to babies they are
responsible for nurturing through infancy and childhood, are not going to
stop talking about what happened to their children after vaccination. Mothers
are not going to shut up and sit down like good little girls after they
witness the bodies and brains of the children they love be destroyed when
Gardasil shots go wrong.
Mothers Will Not
Stop Thinking Critically
They are not going to stop reading the medical literature and
thinking critically about the science65 66 67 68 69 7071 used to justify giving every
child the most expensive federally recommended pediatric vaccine on the U.S.
market 72 to prevent an infection that
is cleared by more than 90 percent of people without a
problem; 73 74
Federal Awards,
Lawsuits, Gardasil Recommendation Withdrawal
Yes, it is illogical to assume that every single
one of the reported Gardasil reaction reports and deaths are caused by the
vaccine but it is just as illogical to assume that none of
them are caused by the vaccine. But logic has nothing to do with
one-size-fits-all vaccine policies that sacrifice individuals, who are
biologically or environmentally at high risk for suffering vaccine
harm, 91 while no research is being
done to identify who they are to spare their lives.
Informed mothers know that among the $3 billion dollars in
federal compensation that has been awarded to vaccine victims in the U.S. are
awards for Gardasil vaccine injuries. 92 They know Gardasil vaccine
injured girls are suing vaccine manufacturers in France, where citizens can
still file product liability lawsuits. 93 They know that public
health officials in Japan no longer recommend Gardasil vaccine because
Japan’s government is not writing off every death and case of brain
inflammation and autoimmunity following Gardasil shots as just a
“coincidence.” 94
HPV Vaccination Made a Top Public Health Priority in U.S. In what may or may not be a coincidence, at the end of December the Centers for Disease Control made HPV vaccination one of the top five "public health priorities" for 2014. In one media article,95 the HPV vaccination rate of 30% in the U.S. was compared to the 85 percent vaccination rate in Rwanda, an impoverished, war-torn country where women have been dying in great numbers from cervical cancer because there has been no routine pap screening available to them. In 2011, Merck created a school-based vaccination program for all sixth graders in Rwanda to be injected with three doses of Gardasil vaccine. 96 But the United States is not Rwanda. In America, cervical cancer has declined more than 70% after pap screening became a routine part of women’s health care in the 1960’s and, by 2006, pap tests had driven down the numbers of new cases of cervical cancer to 9,700 per year with about 3,700 deaths97 in a U.S. population of more than 300 million people. In the U.S. the 14,000 annual deaths from six cancers associated with HPV98 99 100 101 102 103 104 represents less than 3 percent of the more than 550,000 cancer deaths that occur every year. Many Other Public Health Emergencies in U.S. Deserve Priority Status
There are many public health emergencies in our country that
cause far more deaths and disabilities but do not receive a fair share of the
hundreds of billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to health agencies
every year.105 For example:
Bigger Market for
Merck & HPV Vaccine Mandates?
Perhaps the CDC is simply boosting the congressionally approved, lucrative public-private partnership with Pharma 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 by securing a bigger market for Merck's new 9-strain version of Gardasil scheduled to be licensed in the fall of 2014.125 Or perhaps the Merck-Government-Medical Trade lobby is planning another multi-state roll-out of HPV vaccine mandates for all sixth grade children in the U.S. just like they did in 2007.126 127 128 Roll Up Your Sleeve - No Questions Asked
Whatever the reasons that government officials made HPV
vaccination a top public health priority in the U.S., the cyper-lynching of
Katie Couric and mothers reporting Gardasil vaccine reactions is a warning to
parents everywhere. Do not forget that the cruel, dogmatic position of
vaccine risk denialism is: Roll up your sleeve - no questions asked - and
“may the odds be ever in your favor.” 129 130
Do you have a harassment story to share? Click here to complete our
Vaccine Harassment Reporting Form. Your personal identity will be
kept confidential. Below you will also find stories shared by others. They
are listed in chronological order, with the most recent at the top.
To view additional vaccine reporting options and to read
others' stories, click here.
By
Theresa Wrangham
Guest Commentary
Re: "Colorado
vaccination policy needs booster shot," Dec. 11 editorial.
The National Vaccine Information Center
(NVIC) supports voluntary informed consent to medical risk-taking and opposes
recommendations to restrict personal-belief vaccine exemptions in Colorado.
Vaccines are pharmaceutical products that
carry a risk for injury and death. The Institute of Medicine has stated that
many vaccine injury risk factors for individuals have yet to be defined. The
vaccine-injured are as real as those harmed by disease.
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, which shields drug companies and pediatricians from civil
liability for vaccine injuries and deaths, the federal government has awarded
nearly $3 billion to the vaccine-injured. The law also already requires all vaccine
providers to give parents vaccine benefit and risk information and to report
hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination to the federal
government. Sadly, only between 1 percent and 10 percent of all vaccine
reactions are reported.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report
referenced in The Post's editorial and the stakeholder report show that
Colorado is the fourth most improved state for vaccination rates — vaccine
exemptions have declined. Colorado's disease surveillance data shows that 66
percent of children (7 months to 17 years) who got whooping cough (pertussis)
in 2011 were vaccinated. The CDC has acknowledged that pertussis vaccine
effectiveness is not optimal and that recent outbreaks cannot be blamed on
the unvaccinated.
There is no infectious disease crisis in
Colorado that justifies changing the personal-belief vaccine exemption law.
Targeting certain parents for
"additional education" infers that those taking the exemption are
ignorant or irresponsible and reduces education to a coercion tactic with
associated costs for Colorado's taxpayers. The informed consent ethic is
affirmed in public health laws when there are no barriers to voluntarily
accepting, delaying or declining one or more vaccines.
Theresa Wrangham of Louisville is executive
director of the National Vaccine Information Center.
Vaccination
and Free Choice
This
column is a rebuttal to an earlier column by
Reason science correspondent Ron Bailey that argued that "people who
refuse vaccination are asserting that they have a right to 'swing' their
microbes at other people." That column excited significant reaction.
Bailey will respond to Dr. Singer's piece, in turn.
In the 2002 sci-fi noir film Minority Report, PreCrime, a specialized police agency,
apprehends people who are forecast to commit crimes. No trial is necessary
because the not-yet-committed crime is considered a vision of the future and
thus a matter of fact. The film’s plot challenges viewers to consider the
issue of free will vs. determinism, and consequently, the morality of
punishing someone for a crime not yet committed. It serves as a useful
metaphor for the argument against coercive vaccination.
Some argue
that mandatory mass vaccination is an act of self-defense, and thus
completely compatible with the principles underpinning a free society. Unless
people are forcibly immunized, it’s argued, they will endanger the life and
health of innocent bystanders. But such a position requires infallible
precognition.
Not everyone
who is vaccinated against a microbe develops immunity to that microbe.
Conversely, some unvaccinated people never become infected. Some people have
inborn “natural” immunity against certain viruses and other microorganisms.
(Central Africans born with sickle cell trait provide a classic example of
such inborn immunity: their sickle-shaped red blood cells are inhospitable to
the mosquito-borne parasite that causes malaria. But there are innumerable
less obvious examples.) Finally, some people are just lucky and never get
exposed to a contagious microbe.
Just like
not every pregnant woman who drinks alcohol or smokes tobacco passes on a
malady or disability to her newborn baby, not every pregnant woman infected
with a virus or other microbe passes on the infection to her fetus—nor are
all such babies born with birth defects.
A free society demands adherence
to the “non-aggression principle.” No person can initiate
force against another, and can only use force in retaliation or in
self-defense. Forcibly injecting substances—attenuated microbes or
otherwise—into someone else’s body can not be justified as an act of
self-defense, because there is no way to determine with certainty that the
person will ever be responsible for disease transmission.
Aside from
the obviously pernicious societal precedent set by the initiation of force
against those who have not yet committed an act of aggression, there are also
practical issues to consider.
How would
coercive vaccination be enforced? What degree of invasion of personal
information and privacy would be needed in order to make sure that everyone
is vaccinated? How much liberty and autonomy would members of society have to
surrender in order to make a system of coercive vaccination work? And what
kind of liberty-infringing precedents would be established by enacting a
mandatory vaccination program?
Then there is the matter of “herd immunity.”
The phenomenon of herd immunity
allows many unvaccinated people to avoid disease because they free ride off the significant portion of the
population that is immunized and doesn’t, therefore, spread a given disease.
Economists point out that free riding is an unavoidable fact of life: people
free ride when they purchase a new, improved, and cheaper product that was
“pre-tested” on more affluent people who wanted to be the first to own it;
people free ride when they use word-of-mouth reviews to buy goods or
services, or to see a film; those who choose not to carry concealed weapons
free ride a degree of personal safety off the small percentage of the public
that carries concealed weapons. So long as a person being free-ridden is
getting a desired value for an acceptable price, and is not being harmed by
the free riding, it really shouldn’t matter to that person. Achieving a
society without free riders is not only unnecessary, it is impossible.
So perhaps
allowing a certain amount of free riders could mitigate the disruption to
liberty caused by a mandatory vaccination program. But then, how many free
riders should be allowed? And what criteria would be used to decide who gets
to ride free?
As a medical
doctor I am a strong advocate of vaccination against communicable and
infectious diseases. I am irritated by the hysteria and pseudo-science behind
much of the anti-vaccination literature and rhetoric. In my perfect world,
everyone would agree with me and voluntarily get vaccinated against the gamut
of nasty diseases for which we have vaccines. (In my perfect world, pregnant
women wouldn’t smoke tobacco or drink alcohol until after delivery.)
But free
societies are sometimes messy. To live in a free society, one must be willing
to tolerate people who make bad decisions and bad choices, as long as they
don’t directly infringe on the rights of others.
A strong
argument can be made that it is self-defense to quarantine people who are
infected with a disease-producing organism and are objectively threatening
the contamination of others. But in such a case, the use of force against the
disease carrier is based upon evidence that the carrier is contagious and may
infect others.
Any mass
immunization program that uses compulsion rather than persuasion will, on
balance, do more harm to the well being of a free people than any good it was
intended to convey.
Federal agency efforts to target adults and persuade them to toe the
government vaccine policy line are underway. Learn more about campaigns for
HPV vaccine and other vaccines...
http://www.nvic.org
Bombshell
Interview About HPV Vaccines Reveals Cruel Nature of Vaccine Pushers
Refreshingly,
there was a brave attempt recently in a popular show seen by over two million
viewers on ABC TV to present balanced information regarding the controversial
HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines. [1]
It was
expected that to touch on the subject of vaccine injuries and death would
bring down the wrath of the vaccine industry. And it certainly appeared to do
so.
In
addition to opinions from vaccine promoters, there were interviews with a
grieving mother who shared the tragic story of her daughter’s death and a
brave young girl who described her suffering after the vaccine. Two doctors
gave their opinions. While one was in favor of the vaccine, the other
questioned its necessity, given the overall success of Pap testing to screen
for cervical cancer.
Show’s Journalist Compelled to Publish
Follow-Up
As
feared, the show’s journalist, Katie Couric, who was probably under pressure
from the influential vaccine industry, added a new video [2] and a post
script. It appeared on the show’s web site the next day and ended with:
“We do not want to leave our viewers with an
irrational fear of the vaccine and for that reason we’re going to continue
the conversation and invite a number of medical experts, journalists and
scientists to weigh in here, on our site.”
The
aftermath in several discussion threads, with thousands of comments on the
show’s website, revealed the true nature of many pro-vaxers. [3,4,5]
Kicking of Sufferers Who Were Lying Down
Countless
parents described in detail adverse reactions to the HPV vaccines, which
disabled or killed their formerly athletic, active and happy daughters.
Those
who were in sorrow and pain were ruthlessly attacked by pro-vaccine people
who insulted and accused them of telling lies. There were emotional elements
when some who were in grief were provoked by hurtful responses from
pro-vaxers, the words spoken by the latter being by far the nastiest and, no
doubt, shocking thousands of readers.
Shameful Comments From Pro-Vaxers
Some of these comments
were posted by people who have been known to boast about their academic and
intellectual backgrounds:
·
“The only thing malignant here is the cancerous
spread of anti-vax lies.”
·
·
“Vaccine injury is one of the biggest lies that anti-vaxers
tell.”
·
“Really, you anti-vaxers just pull it out of
your rear orifice sometimes.”
·
·
“ I don’t for a minute believe your daughter
had an adverse reaction to the vaccination. I think you’re just here for the
attention.”
·
·
“These parents are falsely blaming Gardasil
to get rid of some the pain and guilt resulting from their children’s
condition.”
·
·
“These aren’t victims of these vaccines.
They are people that desperately want to blame vaccines because they are too
lazy or too dishonest to report the truth.”
·
·
Grieving mother: “I wish my daughter had made
it to 32; she died at 17 as a result of a reaction to this vaccine.” Callous comment by a
pro-vaccine person who surely had no access to the daughter’s medical
records: “I think we have established that your
daughter did not die of a reaction to this vaccine.”
·
·
“Your story is on Sane Vax. I don’t need to
know anything more to know you’re not telling the truth. You hoping for a
payout?”
·
·
“There are people here purposefully
misleading others with their lies about the efficiency and safety of the HPV
vaccine, assumingly because they like to see people die from cancer.”
·
·
“Stop reading the holocaust deniers of
whale-to and stop siding with cancer.”
·
·
“There is the troubling statistic that the
vast majority of alleged vaccine injuries come from people who believe
strongly in a magical Jew who did tricks 2000 years ago.”
·
·
“You have all the credibility of some loon
in the public square screeching that the earth is flat, the moon launch was a
hoax and 9-11 an inside job.”
·
·
“Since the goal is to generate fear,
accuracy is not important to you. This is why you omit the evidence that
shows that you are lying.”
·
·
“The Gardasil victims memorial is a tribute to one
thing only: the willingness of the anti-vaccination crowd to keep passing on
false information long after it has been debunked, because somehow the belief
is more important than whether or not it is factual.”
·
·
“There aren’t two sides to the story. There is science, and
there is quackery. And a bunch of Munchausen moms looking for attention.”
Comments from
sympathizers of the vaccine-injured, backed by serious research, were
attacked by vaccine promoters who responded by posting insults and
cherry-picked studies.
No Evidence of Safety For These HPV
Vaccines
Evidence
of safety is not shown by biased, manipulated research papers posted by
arrogant, aggressive vaccine promoters, some of whom have no background
regarding vaccines, whose prime concern is often to protect their clients’
interests; nor is evidence of safety shown by presentation of biased studies
and statistics from Big Pharma’s databases, an industry known to be steeped
in deception and corruption.
The two
controversial HPV vaccines are Gardasil, which is produced by Merck and
Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). When there is widespread
knowledge that these companies are certainly not trustworthy, there is surely
no reason to trust their products. [6,7]
Proof that
these two vaccines are dangerous is shown by the intense suffering which
gigantic numbers of previously healthy, active young girls have experienced
after the vaccines. However, evidence does not depend on numbers. Thousands,
hundreds, ten or even one who is suffering may be proof.
Tragically,
young boys have started to experience similar fates. [8]
The Nasty Comments Will Not Go Away
Many
sufferers were forced to leave the discussions, having been reduced to tears
because of ridicule and harassment.
Several
of those who had posted cruel comments also disappeared, some perhaps wisely
deleting their obnoxious words.
Original
images of their comments have been spread across countless countries of the
world. The ugly pictures are archived by many as a permanent reminder of the
blatant cruelty of those who support an industry which is based on greed and
corruption.
More Obnoxious Comments From Pro-Vaxers
How can
people who show such shameful behavior expect to be respected? Many of the
worst comments are omitted from this article because they are so utterly
hurtful that they should not be repeated.
·
“You are an immensely
tedious, deluded twat. And stop drooling.”
·
·
“You are a frigging loon. Go
back on medication please.”
·
·
“Screw it. I’ll say it. ARE
YOU PEOPLE ALL COMPLETELY CRAZY?
·
·
Do you know why people like
myself and xxxx and xxxx engage in debate with crazy people like yourselves?
And you lunatics have the nerve to stand up and argue otherwise?”
·
·
“Sure, but does anyone
validate your research? Or are you now a surgeon because you read on how to
remove ingrown toenails?”
·
·
“I see the usual anti-vaccine
loons couldn’t quit their yammering and stammering.”
·
·
“I think they enjoy the
endless ridicule. They get to paint themselves as martyrs twice. If they
didn’t enjoy it, they would stop doing it.”
·
·
“There has not been a single
death that has been conclusively linked to the vaccine, just emotional,
unsubstantiated anecdotes.”
·
·
“The best you people can do
is the money grubbing, lying dishonest ‘age of autism’ website.”
·
·
“I always find it distressing
that anti-vaccine activists like yourself care so little for victims of
disease.”
·
·
“I’m afraid that the
judgement of the future on you is likely to be that you are in the same class
of folk who worried that the smallpox vaccination would turn them into cows.”
·
·
“A corpse doesn’t make big
pharma any money, but fear mongering is wonderful for big herbal, big farmer,
and big alterna, which is really the core issue.”
·
·
Sorrowful mother: “My daughter has been sick
now for two years following her second Gardasil vaccine. She tries so hard to
be strong but the sickness wears her down daily. I cry daily.” Hurtful response: “Somebody needs to call the
waaambulance.”
·
·
“Good anti vaxers read anti
vax websites as they’re easy to understand. They’re written in basic English
so those who lack the education and intellectual capacity to understand the
medicine and the science can still feel intellectual.”
·
·
Parent: “I spend most of my life
helping vaccine injured.” The parent cried because of this response, “And yet
you’re so bad at it.”
·
·
“I think it is sad that you
think she is damaged because she can’t have children. My daughters mean more
to me than their ability to provide me with grandchildren.”
·
It may
well be questioned whether the person who posted the following quote should
be reported for supplying false information to the authorities:
“Once again an anti vaxer tells us part of a
story without any evidence at all. Some of those VAERS reports were put up by
me, they’re false. I proved that VAERS is not a source of information on this
subject. So how many of these reports are factual and not anti vaxers pushing
an agenda?”
Conclusion
More and
more are people reaching each other from all corners of the world and sharing
their sorrow because of the HPV vaccines. They receive comfort and
information from knowledgeable and sympathetic people who genuinely care. [9]
Many of
those who are helping have expert and unbiased knowledge of the vaccines. The
numbers of voices of those who are suffering in anguish and despair because
of the HPV vaccines are growing rapidly day by day. The world is hearing them
now.
References
Roxie Fiste, mother of Britt woke
up on the morning after Mother’s Day to see her daughter having yet another
seizure, unable to see, walk or speak. Eventually, Britt’s vision, and
speech returned in time to appear on Monday’ night’s radio show. Roxie
and Britt – shared their life changing experiences after getting the
Gardasil vaccination for HPV. Marian Greene, founder of Truth About Gardasil
also joined in the conversation. Marian and others have been working on
raising public awareness and protest to legislation moving through the states
on limiting parental rights over vaccination of their children.
Vaccination without informed consent is a parental violation. The heart
wrenching and disturbing interview is now posted. Please share with
others in your networks.
Marian Greene, founder of Truth About Gardasil and Britt Fiste will joinLeslie Carol Botha
on Holy Hormones Honey! on Monday night, May 13. We will be discussing the
HPV vaccine, Gardasil
– the harm and injury it has brought to thousands of girls nationwide, and
the insult to their parents AND all medical consumers as Pharma lobbyists
push legislation to take away parental
rights to
vaccination choice and consent. Holy Hormones Honey! The broadcast will be
audio streamed only on KRFC FM Fort Collins from 6 to 7 pm MST.
 |
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Gardasil Vaccine, Katie Couric and Cyber-Lynching
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
