Saturday, July 27, 2013

Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines Due To Infertility Side Effects And Citizens Petition For The Ban of Gardasil and Cervarix.

Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines Due To Infertility Side Effects And Citizens Petition For The Ban of Gardasil and Cervarix. 

(Ed. Note: For the past few years many people and organizations has called for either the withdrawal of these Vaccines, further testing and transparency of test studies, as opposed to the on-going defense of them by the Pharmaceutical Giants and their Government shills. Japan has taken a most positive step when you consider the collateral damage we are aware of presently and given the possibility of severe fertility issues; these products ought to be banned until the world has a full clear and truth picture of both their immediate and long range side-effects impact on the young women of this planet. The bottom line on this issue is not the corporate balance sheet but the health and well-being of the young women world-wide. We demand THE TRUTH!)

CLICK  TO OPEN: Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines Due To Infertility Side Effects

The government of Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare is speaking out about the destructive side effects coming from popular, worldwide-promoted HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix. Gardasil is Merck's opus and Cervarix is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.

As of today, an estimated 3.28 million Japanese people alone have been inoculated with these HPV vaccinations. So far, 1,968 adverse cases have been presented to the Japanese government, detailing severe medical side effects.

The Japanese people are reporting side effects ranging from "long-term pain and numbness to infertility and paralysis." In the wake of these complaints, the Japanese government has decided to withdraw its support for these widely pushed and controversial HPV inoculations…

Global pharmaceutical giant Merck isn't listening to the ground reports of the vaccination's awful side effects either, stating in a public decision, "While direct causal relationship between the vaccines and serious symptoms observed after inoculation has not been established at this time...We will continue to collaborate with all stakeholders, including (the health ministry), to monitor and verify safety data toward resumption of active promotion for HPV vaccination as soon as possible."

The government of Japan looking into nearly 2,000 adverse HPV vaccine reactions

The HPV vaccinations have not been stalled or suspended in Japan. The government is just not actively promoting the use of them anymore. These HPV vaccines are still available for free to girls provided through subsidies, mandated by law. The only difference now is that Japanese medical institutions must now inform the young girls the government health ministry does not recommend the vaccines any longer.

In hopes of appealing to everybody, VP of the Health Ministry, Mariko Momoi, commented, "The decision (not to recommend the vaccination) does not mean that the vaccine itself is problematic from the viewpoint of safety. By implementing investigations, we want to offer information that can make the people feel more at ease."

Momoi is one of five men on the government task force leading the investigation of the HPV vaccinations. The task force has heard 1,968 adverse effects and are further investigating 43 of the cases. In the months ahead, the government will be forced to decide to continue withdrawing their support or to go ahead and reinstate their recommendation for the vaccines.

The U.S. Uses Taxpayer Dollars To Pay For Dangerous Gardasil Vaccinations

Despite mounting evidence of Gardasil dangers, other countries remain under the thumb of Merck's vaccinations spell. For instance, the Unites States avidly recommends that teenage girls be HPV vaccinated, as they promote industry-backed studies that tout the vaccination's "effectiveness." The United States actively uses tax payer dollars to fund federal Vaccines for Children programs, which include the use of Gardasil, provided by the Centers for Disease Control. In fact, 20 states have passed laws that set aside funds for Gardasil education programs and implementation. As governments believe they are promoting general health and wellness, it's important to look at the documented statistics of people experiencing dangerous side effects.

Here is a list of US hospitalization incidences due to HPV vaccinations, provided by


A Canadian medical study, conducted by the University of British Columbia's Neural Dynamics Research Group, first reported by the Washington Examiner, included a list of Gardasil side effects that entailed, death, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, and deep vein thrombosis," among others.

This isn't the first wave of medical corruption Merck has promoted. Merck is known for falsifying test results for their own mumps vaccines. Two former employees filed a lawsuit in 2010 alleging the company convinced the federal government to purchase hundreds of millions of dollars worth of worthless vaccines. Merck is also known for their drugging of cattle with a recycled anti-partitioning drug called Zilmax. They are most infamously known for their Vioxx scandal from 1999 to 2004, which yielded 38,000 deaths and a massive recall.

So why does anyone, any government, any sane person trust pharmaceutical giants like Merck?

Why is this organization of murderers and thieves still in business?

Why aren't all government withdrawing their support from these dangerous HPV vaccinations like Gardasil?

Why are the true alternatives to preventing cervical and other cancers not discussed?

Why is anything that threatens human fertility widely is promoted?

[IMPORTANT NOTE: The SaneVax Team has discovered that a few hours after this article was posted, the petition below was either removed from the website or otherwise made inaccessible. We cannot believe this was done by the National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee. They have been working too hard to ban HPV vaccines in Japan.

The SaneVax Team would like to let the National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee know that citizens of the world are watching the HPV vaccine developments in Japan very closely. Your efforts to protect Japanese citizens from unnecessary harm are greatly appreciated. You have our support.

After much searching, and some help from our friends - the link below is now working.]

At the present time, there is no credible evidence that these vaccines will reduce the rates of cervical cancer. The Japanese people believe there is no reason to expose their women to any risk of serious adverse reactions from unproven vaccines when safe and effective ways of controlling the disease are in place.

Therefore, the National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee has organized a petition to ban the use of both Gardasil and Cervarix in Japan. It is currently available for anyone in the world to sign. This petition, which will be submitted to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Vaccine Side Effects Committee, puts forth the following demands:

§  Ban the use of HPV vaccines in Japan
§  Investigate all who were vaccinated
§  Acknowledge any serious adverse reactions
§  Establish treatment and generous relief for victims
These demands are more than reasonable considering Japan’s experience with the use of HPV vaccines. You can help Japanese women by signing their petition on this site – National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee Petition.

Instructions for those who do not read Japanese are below.
On the top right hand side of the site you will find the following boxes. Enter the information requested, as follows:

– your last name
– your first name
メールアドレス – your email address
– country where you reside.
郵便番号 – your postal code.
コメント – any comment.  Whatever you wish to say to the Japanese Government health officials

and then, press that RED

LOS ANGELES, CA, July 26, 2013 ( – The U.S. government may be trillions of dollars in debt, but it recently found $544,188 to give to a University of California researcher for a promotional campaign, disguised as a study, aimed at increasing the use of the controversial Gardasil vaccine by lower-income teens.

Gardasil is a vaccine to prevent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), thought to be the most common sexually transmitted infection in the world. HPV is known to cause multiple types of cancers, including cervical, anal, penile, and throat cancer. Because of this link, Gardasil is often referred to as the “cervical cancer vaccine,’” but it does not prevent cancer cells from forming in the body. Instead, the vaccine prevents the four most common strains of HPV, out of an estimated 150 strains.

In part because the vaccine has been linked to dangerous and sometimes fatal reactions in young girls, sales have declined steadily since its introduction in 2006, despite the fact that thanks to an aggressive behind-the-scenes lobbying campaign by vaccine manufacturer Merck, many states now require the vaccination before entering secondary school.
But sales may soon enjoy a boost in the poorer neighborhoods of Los Angeles County, as UC researchers work with the L.A. County Department of Public Health on a study aimed at getting more parents to have their girls injected.

Called “Increasing HPV Vaccine Uptake in a Low Income Ethnic Minority Population,” the project seems more like an advertising campaign than research. But the American taxpayer, not Merck, is footing the bill, to the tune of more than half a million dollars through a National Institutes of Health(NIH) grant.

Dr. Roshan Bastani, the lead researcher for the project, told the goal of the ‘study’ is “to see if a simple intervention delivered through an existing county service can substantially increase HPV vaccine uptake among low-income girls in Los Angeles County.”
To that end, employees at the Los Angeles County Department of Health will ask incoming female callers whether they have a daughter between the ages of 11 and 18. If so, the employees will provide the study’s prescribed “intervention” by giving the mothers basic information about the vaccine and a referral to a free or low cost clinic where they can get it.

Since a study has to have a control group, Bastani says the experiment will run only every other week. “It’s a randomized design,” Bastani told “It’s every other week, so women calling on the ‘intervention weeks’ will get the intervention, women calling on the control weeks will not.”

If a parent accepts the first ‘intervention,’ the health department will follow up with a series of phone calls to monitor their subjects’ progress. “The vaccine is in three doses,” explained Bastani. “We make a first call giving them enough time to see if they got the first dose, then we call back later to see if they completed the three-dose vaccine.”

To convince those parents who resist the ‘intervention,’ the researchers have provided health department employees with scripts that contain “individually tailored messages to address callers’ barriers to HPV vaccination,” in six different languages.

Objections to the Gardasil vaccine are common. In 2010, less than half of U.S. teens received even one dose, and fewer than one-third received the full series of three injections, according to the National Immunization Survey.
According to the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of 2011, Gardasil had been linked to 49 sudden deaths, 213 permanent disabilities, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, 41 reports of cervical cancer, and thousands of adverse events reports, ranging from headaches and nausea, to outbreaks of genital warts, anaphylactic shock, grand mal convulsion, foaming at the mouth, coma and paralysis.
The vaccine’s spotty safety record prompted one well-known physician, Dr. Joseph Mercola, to proclaim it “largely ineffective, potentially very dangerous, and a major waste of money.”


Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil vaccination


Gardasil victims speak out in videos released by famed doc


California mulls giving 12-year-olds STD vaccine Gardasil without parental consent


What went wrong with Gardasil sales?


CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for Immigrants


Gardasil Researcher Admits Vaccine May Be More Dangerous than the Disease


Gardasil Vaccination Results in Three Outbreaks of Genital Warts in Fiji School Children


Gardasil - 18 Dead, Thousands Suffer Complications


Why Medical Authorities Cannot be Trusted on Gardasil HPV Vaccine


Support for HPV Vaccine Gardasil Helps Planned Parenthood Says LDI President


ATLANTA — Only about half of U.S. teenage girls have gotten a controversial cervical cancer vaccine — a rate that's changed little in three years.
"We're dropping the ball," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "This is a huge disappointment."
About 54 percent of teenage girls have received at least one of the three HPV shots. Only a third was fully immunized with all three doses.
Last year's rates were essentially unchanged from 2011, and up only slightly from 2010. Rates for other vaccines aimed at adolescents have risen much faster.

A big part of the problem: Family doctors aren't prodding patients to get HPV shots as forcefully as they recommend other vaccines, health officials said. 

(Ed’s Note: My Dr. will not administer the vaccine based upon research available “To Him”.)

Chances are that you might not be familiar with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 which created the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims otherwise known as the “Vaccine court.” In essence, the Vaccine court was created to shield vaccine manufacturers from federal and state court litigation.

While the Vaccine court has, on occasion, made sizeable awards to children injured from vaccines, the structure of the court is “a no-fault compensation scheme” which gives cover for Big Pharma to disclaim that theirs vaccines are actually dangerous.

As for Gardasil, the Vaccine court has already paid out almost $6 million in claims concerning that drug (including two claims which resulted in death). The Vaccine court has also awarded $20 million in cases for vaccine-induced autism – something the drug giants tell us is just a medical fairytale. Likewise, the court has handed out numerous awards for flu shots that have caused Guillain-Barre Syndrome and even death. 

The ‘medical miracle’ of vaccines has proven quite miraculous on at least one front, the financial one. Investors in the manufacture, distribution and administration of vaccines have reaped handsome rewards since the creation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC):

The topic of vaccine safety became prominent during the mid 1970s with increases in lawsuits filed on behalf of those presumably injured by the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT) vaccine. Legal decisions were made and damages awarded despite the lack of scientific evidence to support vaccine injury claims. As a result of these decisions, liability and prices soared, and several manufacturers halted production. A vaccine shortage resulted and public health officials became concerned about the return of epidemic disease. To reduce liability and respond to public health concerns, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986.

This change in liability created an environment where vaccine manufacturers could evolve from threatening to get out of the vaccine production business to generating the following sales in 2012:1

1.       Prevnar 13® – $3.718 billion – Pfizer
2.    Gardasil® – $1.900 billion – Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
3.    PENTAct-HIB – $1.522 billion – Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
4.    Infanrix/Pediarix – $1.183 billion – by GlaxoSmithKline
5.     Fluzone – $1.152 billion – by Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
6.     Hepatitis franchise – $986 million – by GlaxoSmithKline
7.     Varivax – $846 million – by Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
8.    Menactra – $735 million – by Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur
9.     Zostavax – $651 million – by Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur
10. RotaTeq® – $648 million – by Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur
11.  Synflorix® – $587 million – by GlaxoSmithKline
12.Pneumovax®23 – $580 million – by Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur
13.Rotarix – $549 million – by GlaxoSmithKline
14.Adacel – $469 million – by Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
15. Prevnar – $399 million – by Pfizer

For the five producers of the top 15 vaccines, this is a total of $15.925 billion; not at all bad for an industry that was threatening to close down operations 30 years ago. Apparently, limited liability does wonders for the bottom line.

Whether the miraculous nature of the limited liability vaccination programs instituted since the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was created extends to safety and efficacy remains hotly debated.

For instance, in 1980 there were three recommended vaccines given in five shots before age 2; DPT (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis), MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) and OPV (oral polio vaccine). The autism rate in 1980 was estimated at 2/10,000. Now, children could receive as many as 24 shots by 2 years of age and five shots in a single visitand the autism rate is now 1/88.2

No, this information does not prove causation. However, any reasonable person can see that a correlation exists. This correlation needs to be thoroughly investigated by people who are not stakeholders in vaccines or vaccination programs.

Until that research is completed, exercise your right to informed consent.4 Do your research.

Get These Questions Answered Before You Decide If A Vaccine Is Right For You Or Your Child:

      How serious is the disease being vaccinated against?

     What are the chances of being exposed to this disease?

     What is the normal outcome of contracting this disease?

     What is the worst case scenario of contracting this disease?

      What are the ingredients in this vaccine?

      Do I have an allergy to any of the vaccine ingredients?

     How effective is this vaccine?

     What are the adverse effects currently associated with this vaccine?

     Have I experienced an adverse reaction to any prior vaccination?

         Does my family’s health history make me more likely to  suffer an  adverse reaction to this vaccine? 

         Does my current state of health indicate I can be vaccinated now, should wait to vaccinate later, or not vaccinate at all?

       What are the alternative ways to protect against this disease?

 Don’t play vaccine roulette – evaluate the risks, benefits, and alternatives – be a wise medical consumer!
Above all, remember vaccines can and do cause injury or death for some individuals.


Top 15 Selling Vaccines of 2012Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, July 2013

History of Vaccine ScheduleThe Children’s Hospital of   Philadelphia, reviewed by Paul A. Offit, MD

    Informed ConsentMedline Plus, National Institutes of Health

Dr  Aaron  Motsoaledi,  MP,  Minister  of  Health  South  Africa:  Stop  2014  mass  HPV  Vaccination  in South  Africa!

The  South  African  Minister  of  Health,  Dr.  Aaron Motsoaledi,  has  announced  that  the  government will  be  buying  520 000  doses  of  the  HPV  Vaccine to  be  given  to  young  girls  aged  9 and  10.  This  is due  to  happen  in  February  2014.

As a group of parents, grandparents, teachers, healthcare practitioners and citizens of South Africa, we are deeply concerned:
There is a serious lack of scientific evidence that the HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Vaccine is safe to give to young girls. After Gardasil (the name of the HPV Vaccine) was licensed and three doses given to 11 – 12 year old girls, there were thousands of reports of sudden collapse with unconsciousness within 24 hours, seizures, muscle pain and weakness, disabling fatigue, Guillain Barre Syndrome, facial and limb paralysis, brain inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, blood clots, optic neuritis, strokes, heart and other serious health problems, including death, following the receipt of this vaccine. 
As of 2012, there have been a total of 26,304 reports of adverse reactions made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) associated with the HPV Vaccines, including 118 deaths. Please note that these figures do not include all countries – the actual figures are much higher. 
There is no evidence that this vaccine prevents cervical cancer.
Gardasil contains aluminum and polysorbate. Aluminum is neurotoxic; both are known to cause cancer in lab animals and alter immune response. 
We must learn from other countries. The Indian Council of Medical Research has suspended the cervical cancer vaccination program after deaths and complications were reported when this vaccine was administered to young girls in India. A Supreme Court Suit has been filed over the HPV Vaccine Tragedy in India. The question that is being asked in India is how were 24 000 young girls allowed to be vaccinated without being given any information on potential risks or follow-up appointments? 
The South African Government is buying 520 000 doses of this very vaccination.
Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher, HPV vaccine development: “This vaccine should not be mandated for 11 year old girls …. Its not been tested in little girls for efficacy. At 11, these girls don’t get cervical cancer – they won’t know for 25 years if they will get cervical cancer. Giving it to 11 year olds is a great big public health experiment.” 
In regards to Child Rights, The South African Constitution states “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child” 
It is our duty to protect our children. As the gatekeepers of our children’s health (and lives) we have the right to know the truth and to make informed decisions: 

Using Merck’s Gardasil vaccine as a case in point, an investigation documents Big Pharma’s near-total control of governmental health agency decisions and the utter lack of concern by the decision makers. However, some scientists are speaking out, and here’s what they have to say.

Researchers are speaking out about the corruption in science with regard to vaccines. Certainly, they’re in the minority, but their expertise and solid evidence for their claims are resulting in both their studies and their concerns being published in medical journals.
The arena of vaccination, which has been adversely affecting so many children, is now a centerpoint for documenting how Big Pharma has taken over so much of science, resulting in outright fraud that’s used to promote their products. Scientists Lucija Tomljenovic, Christopher A. Shaw, Judy Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, and Toni Bark use the example of Merck’s Gardasil, a human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, to demonstrate the point that HPV vaccine activism is not based on science, but instead on misrepresentations of science.
In a letter signed by all five of these scientists, they point out several flaws in the claims that Merck’s Gardasil and Pfizer’s Cervarix make to sell their vaccines[1]:
1.     HPV vaccines have never been shown to prevent cervical cancer.
2.    The end-points used in the studies are based on infections and lesions that usually heal without help, so how can they demonstrate efficacy in preventing cancer several years later?
3.    The trials are biased to produce false negatives and therefore cannot accurately estimate the risk of developing cancer.
4.    Passive methods of recording adverse effects cannot accurately reflect how prevalent they are.
5.    Accurate estimates of the actual frequency of HPV vaccine adverse effects cannot be made when such effects are automatically dismissed as unrelated to the vaccine.
6.    Women are not informed that, in some instances, the HPV vaccines may increase the rate at which existing abnormalities develop, thus causing the cancer from which they’re supposedly being protected.
7.    When information about HPV vaccine risks and limitations are not provided, women cannot possibly make informed decisions about whether to have the vaccine.
8.    Health regulators are making decisions based on information provided by the same corporations that hope to profit from them. How can they possibly make rational decisions on such limited and biased information?
 Investigation into Merck’s Murky Dealings with Government
“Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in State Vaccination Policymaking” is an investigation into the lobbying efforts by Merck to promote the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.[2] It states:
Merck engaged in direct lobbying to varying degrees in all of the states we studied. Merck proactively contacted legislators to discuss strategies to maximize uptake of Gardasil, either directly through company employees or by using local political consultants, prominent physicians, or public relations firms.
Many respondents reported that company representatives proposed specific legislation, often drafting the bills and searching for a sponsor. In most states, their efforts focused on a school-entry mandate. Respondents pointed out that Merck’s activities were not unusual, although the public seemed to have been unaware that private companies played such a role in the legislative process. One commented, “Just about every vaccine mandate that we have lately has been the result, at least partially, of the drug industry’s efforts.” [Emphasis mine.]

They asked respondents, who included legislators, health officials, medical professional organizations, advocacy organizations, journalists, health insurers, and clinical researchers, what role pharmaceutical manufacturers should play. The respondents believed that pharmaceutical manufacturers should provide scientific information about the products they push and that it was appropriate for Merck reps to sit on task forces and committee meetings. Worse, though, not one person felt that there was any problem in Merck’s drafting legislation!
In my reading of the paper, it appeared that the respondents tended to hide behind the fact that Merck donated some vaccine, though there were a few who found Merck’s involvement to be inappropriate.
Women in Government (WIG) received funding from Merck, which some respondents felt was just fine, though opinions did vary on that point. It should come as no surprise that WIG heavily promoted implementation of the Gardasil vaccine.[3]
The investigation documented the extremely disturbing influence that pharmaceutical corporations have in governmental health decisions that affect us all.
Response to Investigation into Merck’s Influence in Government
“Who Profits from Uncritical Acceptance of Biased Estimates of Vaccine Efficacy and Safety?”[4] is a definitive statement regarding Merck’s influence in vaccine policy. Tomljenovic and Shaw state:
… [C]areful scrutiny of Gardasil clinical trials shows that their design, as well as data reporting and interpretation, were largely inadequate.
They go on to delineate that optimism about Gardasil’s clinical benefits rests “on an extremely weak base built on a number of untested assumptions and significant misinterpretation of factual evidence.” They cite these examples:
§  The claim that Gardasil will result in a 70% reduction in cervical cancer is made in spite of there being no clinical data to support it.

§  The claim that life-long protection is provided by three vaccine doses has no basis in fact, as studies lasted, at most, five years.

§  The claim that Gardasil’s adverse effects are minor are supported only by “highly flawed safety trial design”.

§  They also point out “evidence of biased and selective reporting of results from clinical trials”.
Their conclusion is:
Keeping in mind that “the primary interest of a pharmaceutical company is developing and selling pharmaceutical product,” one must ask whether rational vaccine policy decisions should be based on conclusions derived from an uncritical acceptance of flawed vaccine safety and efficacy estimates provided by the vaccine manufacturer. Failure to adhere to principles of evidence-based medicine with respect to Gardasil promotion and vaccination policymaking inevitably raises the question of whether we have learned anything from the Vioxx debacle.
Indeed! It most assuredly does look like nothing has been learned from past disastrous destruction of lives by Big Pharma. Just how many times must we go through such agony? The toll Gardasil has been taking is being swept under the table, but the evidence is growing, as Tomljenovic and Shaw have been documenting in their research.
How many more must suffer before we step back from the pharmaceutical juggernaut and refuse to let them manipulate and control our healthcare system?
These articles contain more information on Tomljenovic and Shaw’s research:

1.      HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activismInfectious Agents and Cancer, Lucija Tomljenovic, Judy Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, Toni Bark, Christopher A. Shaw; doi:10.1186/1750-9378-8-6

2.    Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in State Vaccination Policymaking, American Journal of Public Health (on Medscape), Michelle M. Mello, JD, PhD, Sara Abiola, JD, PhD, James Colgrove, PhD

4.    Who Profits from Uncritical Acceptance of Biased Estimates of Vaccine Efficacy and Safety?, American Journal of Public Health, Lucija Tomljenovic and Christopher A. Shaw; doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300837

No comments: