 Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines Due To Infertility Side Effects And Citizens Petition For The Ban of Gardasil and Cervarix.
(Ed.
Note: For the past few years many people and organizations has called for
either the withdrawal of these Vaccines, further testing and transparency of
test studies, as opposed to the on-going defense of them by the Pharmaceutical
Giants and their Government shills. Japan has taken a most positive step when
you consider the collateral damage we are aware of presently and given the
possibility of severe fertility issues; these products ought to be banned
until the world has a full clear and truth picture of both their immediate
and long range side-effects impact on the young women of this planet. The
bottom line on this issue is not the corporate balance sheet but the health
and well-being of the young women world-wide. We demand THE TRUTH!)
CLICK TO OPEN: Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines
Due To Infertility Side Effects
The government of Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and
Welfare is speaking out about the destructive side
effects coming from popular, worldwide-promoted HPV vaccines Gardasil and
Cervarix. Gardasil is Merck's opus and Cervarix is manufactured by
GlaxoSmithKline.
As of today, an estimated 3.28 million Japanese people alone have been inoculated with these HPV vaccinations. So far, 1,968 adverse cases have been presented to the Japanese government, detailing severe medical side effects. The Japanese people are reporting side effects ranging from "long-term pain and numbness to infertility and paralysis." In the wake of these complaints, the Japanese government has decided to withdraw its support for these widely pushed and controversial HPV inoculations…
Global pharmaceutical giant Merck isn't
listening to the ground reports of the vaccination's awful side effects
either, stating in a public decision, "While direct causal relationship
between the vaccines and serious symptoms observed after inoculation has not
been established at this time...We will continue to collaborate with all
stakeholders, including (the health ministry), to monitor and verify safety
data toward resumption of active promotion for HPV vaccination as soon as
possible."
The government of Japan looking into nearly
2,000 adverse HPV vaccine reactions
The HPV vaccinations have not been stalled or suspended in Japan. The government is just not actively promoting the use of them anymore. These HPV vaccines are still available for free to girls provided through subsidies, mandated by law. The only difference now is that Japanese medical institutions must now inform the young girls the government health ministry does not recommend the vaccines any longer. In hopes of appealing to everybody, VP of the Health Ministry, Mariko Momoi, commented, "The decision (not to recommend the vaccination) does not mean that the vaccine itself is problematic from the viewpoint of safety. By implementing investigations, we want to offer information that can make the people feel more at ease." Momoi is one of five men on the government task force leading the investigation of the HPV vaccinations. The task force has heard 1,968 adverse effects and are further investigating 43 of the cases. In the months ahead, the government will be forced to decide to continue withdrawing their support or to go ahead and reinstate their recommendation for the vaccines. The U.S. Uses Taxpayer Dollars To Pay For Dangerous Gardasil Vaccinations
Despite mounting evidence of Gardasil dangers,
other countries remain under the thumb of Merck's vaccinations spell. For
instance, the Unites States avidly recommends that teenage girls be HPV
vaccinated, as they promote industry-backed studies that tout the
vaccination's "effectiveness." The United States actively uses tax
payer dollars to fund federal Vaccines for Children programs, which include
the use of Gardasil, provided by the Centers for Disease Control. In fact, 20 states have passed laws that set aside funds
for Gardasil education programs and implementation. As governments believe
they are promoting general health and wellness, it's important to look at the
documented statistics of people experiencing dangerous side effects.
Here is a list of US hospitalization incidences due to HPV vaccinations, provided by SaneVax.org: http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com MERCK HAS A HISTORY OF CORRUPTION
A Canadian
medical study, conducted by the University of British Columbia's
Neural Dynamics Research Group, first reported
by the Washington Examiner, included a list of Gardasil side effects that entailed,
death, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome,
transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis,
autoimmune disorders, and deep vein thrombosis," among others.
This isn't the first wave of medical corruption Merck has promoted. Merck is known for falsifying test results for their own mumps vaccines. Two former employees filed a lawsuit in 2010 alleging the company convinced the federal government to purchase hundreds of millions of dollars worth of worthless vaccines. Merck is also known for their drugging of cattle with a recycled anti-partitioning drug called Zilmax. They are most infamously known for their Vioxx scandal from 1999 to 2004, which yielded 38,000 deaths and a massive recall. So why does anyone, any government, any sane person trust pharmaceutical giants like Merck? Why is this organization of murderers and thieves still in business? Why aren't all government withdrawing their support from these dangerous HPV vaccinations like Gardasil? Why are the true alternatives to preventing cervical and other cancers not discussed? Why is anything that threatens human fertility widely is promoted? http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com http://www.judicialwatch.org http://www.tokyotimes.com http://www.drugwatch.com/vioxx/recall/
[IMPORTANT NOTE: The SaneVax Team has discovered that a few
hours after this article was posted, the petition below was either removed from
the website or otherwise made inaccessible. We cannot believe this was done by
the National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee. They have been
working too hard to ban HPV vaccines in Japan.
The SaneVax Team would like to let the National Cervical Cancer
Vaccine Victim Liaison Committee know that citizens of the world are watching
the HPV vaccine developments in Japan very closely. Your efforts to protect
Japanese citizens from unnecessary harm are greatly appreciated. You have our
support.
After much searching, and some help from our friends - the link
below is now working.]
At the present time, there is no credible evidence that these
vaccines will reduce the rates of cervical cancer. The Japanese people believe
there is no reason to expose their women to any risk of serious adverse
reactions from unproven vaccines when safe and effective ways of controlling
the disease are in place.
Therefore, the National Cervical Cancer Vaccine Victim Liaison
Committee has organized a petition to ban the use of both Gardasil and Cervarix
in Japan. It is currently available for anyone in the world to sign. This
petition, which will be submitted to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and
Welfare, Vaccine Side Effects Committee, puts forth the following demands:
§ Ban the use of HPV
vaccines in Japan
§ Investigate all who
were vaccinated
§ Acknowledge any
serious adverse reactions
§ Establish treatment
and generous relief for victims
§
These demands are more than reasonable considering Japan’s
experience with the use of HPV vaccines. You can help Japanese women by signing
their petition on this site – National Cervical Cancer Vaccine
Victim Liaison Committee Petition.
Instructions for those who do not read Japanese are below.
On the top right hand side of the site you will find the
following boxes. Enter the information requested, as follows:
姓 – your last name
名 – your first name Eメールアドレス – your email address 国 – country where you reside. 郵便番号 – your postal code. コメント – any comment. Whatever you wish to say to the Japanese Government health officials
and then, press that RED
賛同！
Federal Government Gives Univ. Of
Calif. $500K Grant To Promote STD Vaccines To Parents Of Teen Girl
LOS
ANGELES, CA, July 26, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com)
– The U.S. government may be trillions of dollars in debt, but it recently
found $544,188 to give to a University of California researcher for a
promotional campaign, disguised as a study, aimed at increasing the use of
the controversial Gardasil vaccine by lower-income teens.
Gardasil
is a vaccine to prevent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), thought to be the most
common sexually transmitted infection in the world. HPV is known to cause
multiple types of cancers, including cervical, anal, penile, and throat
cancer. Because of this link, Gardasil is often referred to as the “cervical
cancer vaccine,’” but it does not prevent cancer cells from forming in the
body. Instead, the vaccine prevents the four most common strains of HPV, out
of an estimated 150 strains.
In part because the vaccine has been linked to dangerous
and sometimes fatal reactions in young girls, sales have declined steadily
since its introduction in 2006, despite the fact that thanks to an aggressive
behind-the-scenes lobbying
campaign by vaccine
manufacturer Merck, many states now require the vaccination before entering
secondary school.
But sales may soon enjoy a boost in the poorer
neighborhoods of Los Angeles County, as UC researchers work with the L.A.
County Department of Public Health on a study aimed at getting more parents
to have their girls injected.
Called “Increasing HPV Vaccine Uptake in a Low Income
Ethnic Minority Population,” the project seems more like an advertising
campaign than research. But the American taxpayer, not Merck, is footing the
bill, to the tune of more than half a million dollars through a National
Institutes of Health(NIH) grant.
Dr.
Roshan Bastani, the lead researcher for the project, told CNSNews.com the goal of the ‘study’ is “to see
if a simple intervention delivered through an existing county service can
substantially increase HPV vaccine uptake among low-income girls in Los
Angeles County.”
To that end, employees at the Los Angeles County
Department of Health will ask incoming female callers whether they have a
daughter between the ages of 11 and 18. If so, the employees will provide the
study’s prescribed “intervention” by giving the mothers basic information
about the vaccine and a referral to a free or low cost clinic where they can
get it.
Since a study has to have a control group, Bastani says
the experiment will run only every other week. “It’s a randomized design,”
Bastani told CNSNews.com “It’s every other week, so women calling on the
‘intervention weeks’ will get the intervention, women calling on the control
weeks will not.”
If a parent accepts the first ‘intervention,’ the health
department will follow up with a series of phone calls to monitor their
subjects’ progress. “The vaccine is in three doses,” explained Bastani. “We
make a first call giving them enough time to see if they got the first dose,
then we call back later to see if they completed the three-dose vaccine.”
To convince those parents who resist the ‘intervention,’
the researchers have provided health department employees with scripts that
contain “individually tailored messages to address callers’ barriers to HPV
vaccination,” in six different languages.
Objections to the Gardasil vaccine are common. In 2010,
less than half of U.S. teens received even one dose, and fewer than one-third
received the full series of three injections, according to the National
Immunization Survey.
According to the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of 2011, Gardasil had been linked to 49
sudden deaths, 213 permanent disabilities, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia,
41 reports of cervical cancer, and thousands of adverse events reports,
ranging from headaches and nausea, to outbreaks of genital warts, anaphylactic
shock, grand mal convulsion, foaming at the mouth, coma and paralysis.
The vaccine’s spotty safety record prompted one
well-known physician, Dr. Joseph Mercola, to proclaim it
“largely ineffective, potentially very dangerous, and a major waste of
money.”
ADDITIONAL MUST READS
Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil
vaccination
Gardasil victims speak out in videos released by famed
doc
California mulls giving 12-year-olds STD vaccine
Gardasil without parental consent
What went wrong with Gardasil sales?
CDC Reverses Gardasil Vaccine Requirement for
Immigrants
Gardasil Researcher Admits Vaccine May Be More
Dangerous than the Disease
Gardasil Vaccination Results in Three Outbreaks of
Genital Warts in Fiji School Children
Gardasil - 18 Dead, Thousands Suffer Complications
Why Medical Authorities Cannot be Trusted on Gardasil
HPV Vaccine
Support for HPV Vaccine Gardasil Helps Planned
Parenthood Says LDI President
ATLANTA — Only about half of U.S. teenage girls have gotten a controversial cervical cancer vaccine — a rate that's changed little in three years."We're dropping the ball," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "This is a huge disappointment." About 54 percent of teenage girls have received at least one of the three HPV shots. Only a third was fully immunized with all three doses. Last year's rates were essentially unchanged from 2011, and up only slightly from 2010. Rates for other vaccines aimed at adolescents have risen much faster. A big part of the problem: Family doctors aren't prodding patients to get HPV shots as forcefully as they recommend other vaccines, health officials said. (Ed’s Note: My Dr. will not administer the vaccine based upon research available “To Him”.)
Chances are that
you might not be familiar with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 which created the Office of Special
Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims otherwise known as the “Vaccine court.” In essence, the Vaccine court was
created to shield vaccine manufacturers from federal and state court
litigation.
While the
Vaccine court has, on occasion, made sizeable awards to children
injured from vaccines, the structure of the court is “a no-fault compensation scheme”
which gives cover for Big Pharma to disclaim that theirs vaccines are
actually dangerous.
As for Gardasil,
the Vaccine court has already paid out almost $6 million in claims concerning that drug (including two
claims which resulted in death). The Vaccine court has also awarded $20 million in
cases for vaccine-induced autism – something the drug giants tell us is just
a medical fairytale. Likewise, the court has handed out numerous
awards for flu
shots that have caused Guillain-Barre Syndrome and even death.
The ‘medical miracle’ of vaccines has proven
quite miraculous on at least one front, the financial one. Investors in the
manufacture, distribution and administration of vaccines have reaped handsome
rewards since the creation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
(NCVIA).
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC):
The topic of vaccine safety became prominent
during the mid 1970s with increases in lawsuits filed on behalf of those
presumably injured by the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT) vaccine. Legal
decisions were made and damages awarded despite the lack of scientific
evidence to support vaccine injury claims. As a result of these decisions,
liability and prices soared, and several manufacturers halted production. A
vaccine shortage resulted and public health officials became concerned about
the return of epidemic disease. To reduce liability and respond to public
health concerns, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
(NCVIA) in 1986.
This change in liability created an environment
where vaccine manufacturers could evolve from threatening to get out of the
vaccine production business to generating the following sales in 2012:1
1. Prevnar 13® – $3.718 billion –
Pfizer
2. Gardasil® – $1.900 billion – Merck
& Co/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
3. PENTAct-HIB – $1.522 billion –
Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
4. Infanrix/Pediarix – $1.183 billion –
by GlaxoSmithKline
5. Fluzone – $1.152 billion – by
Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
6. Hepatitis franchise – $986
million – by GlaxoSmithKline
7. Varivax – $846 million – by Merck
& Co/Sanofli Pasteur MSD
8. Menactra – $735 million – by
Sanofli/Sanofli Pasteur
9. Zostavax – $651 million – by
Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur
10. RotaTeq®
– $648 million – by Merck & Co/Sanofli Pasteur
11. Synflorix®
– $587 million – by GlaxoSmithKline
12.Pneumovax®23 – $580 million – by Merck &
Co/Sanofli Pasteur
13.Rotarix – $549 million – by
GlaxoSmithKline
14.Adacel – $469 million – by Sanofli/Sanofli
Pasteur MSD
15. Prevnar
– $399 million – by Pfizer
For the five producers of the top 15 vaccines,
this is a total of $15.925 billion; not at all bad for an industry that was
threatening to close down operations 30 years ago. Apparently, limited
liability does wonders for the bottom line.
Whether the miraculous nature of the limited
liability vaccination programs instituted since the Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP) was created extends to safety and efficacy
remains hotly debated.
For instance, in 1980 there were three
recommended vaccines given in five shots before age 2; DPT (Diphtheria,
Tetanus, Pertussis), MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) and OPV (oral polio
vaccine). The autism rate in 1980 was estimated at 2/10,000. Now, children
could receive as many as 24 shots by 2 years of age and five shots in a
single visit1 and the autism rate is now 1/88.2
No, this information does not prove causation.
However, any reasonable person can see that a correlation exists. This
correlation needs to be thoroughly investigated by people who are not
stakeholders in vaccines or vaccination programs.
Until that research is completed, exercise your
right to informed consent.4 Do your research.
Get These Questions Answered
Before You Decide If A Vaccine Is Right For You Or Your Child:
How
serious is the disease being vaccinated against?
What are
the chances of being exposed to this disease?
What is
the normal outcome of contracting this disease?
What is
the worst case scenario of contracting this disease?
What are
the ingredients in this vaccine?
Do I have
an allergy to any of the vaccine ingredients?
How
effective is this vaccine?
What are
the adverse effects currently associated with this vaccine?
Have I
experienced an adverse reaction to any prior vaccination?
Does my family’s health
history make me more likely to suffer an adverse reaction to this
vaccine?
Does my current state of health
indicate I can be vaccinated now, should wait to vaccinate later, or not
vaccinate at all?
What are
the alternative ways to protect against this disease?
Don’t play vaccine roulette – evaluate the
risks, benefits, and alternatives – be a wise medical consumer!
Above all, remember vaccines
can and do cause injury or death for some individuals.
References:
Top 15 Selling Vaccines of 2012, Genetic
Engineering & Biotechnology News, July
2013
History of Vaccine Schedule, The
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, reviewed
by Paul A. Offit, MD
Informed Consent, Medline Plus, National Institutes of Health
Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, MP, Minister of Health South Africa: Stop 2014 mass HPV Vaccination in South Africa!
The South African Minister of Health, Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi, has announced that the government will be buying 520 000 doses of the HPV Vaccine to be given to young girls aged 9 and 10. This is due to happen in February 2014.
As a group of parents, grandparents, teachers, healthcare
practitioners and citizens of South Africa, we are deeply concerned:
There is a serious lack
of scientific evidence that the HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Vaccine is safe to
give to young girls. After Gardasil (the name of the HPV Vaccine) was licensed
and three doses given to 11 – 12 year old girls, there were thousands of
reports of sudden collapse with unconsciousness within 24 hours, seizures,
muscle pain and weakness, disabling fatigue, Guillain Barre Syndrome, facial
and limb paralysis, brain inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, blood
clots, optic neuritis, strokes, heart and other serious health problems,
including death, following the receipt of this vaccine.
As
of 2012, there have been a total of 26,304 reports of adverse reactions made to
the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) associated with the
HPV Vaccines, including 118 deaths. Please note that these figures do not
include all countries – the actual figures are much higher.
There is no evidence that this vaccine
prevents cervical cancer.
Gardasil contains aluminum and polysorbate.
Aluminum is neurotoxic; both are known to cause cancer in lab animals and alter
immune response.
We
must learn from other countries. The Indian Council of Medical Research has
suspended the cervical cancer vaccination program after deaths and
complications were reported when this vaccine was administered to young girls
in India. A Supreme Court Suit has been filed over the HPV Vaccine Tragedy in
India. The question that is being asked in India is how were 24 000 young girls
allowed to be vaccinated without being given any information on potential risks
or follow-up appointments?
The
South African Government is buying 520 000 doses of this very vaccination.
Dr.
Diane Harper, lead researcher, HPV vaccine development: “This vaccine should
not be mandated for 11 year old girls …. Its not been tested in little girls
for efficacy. At 11, these girls don’t get cervical cancer – they won’t know
for 25 years if they will get cervical cancer. Giving it to 11 year olds is a
great big public health experiment.”
In regards to Child Rights, The South African
Constitution states “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in
every matter concerning the child”
It is
our duty to protect our children. As the gatekeepers of our children’s health
(and lives) we have the right to know the truth and to make informed decisions:
Using Merck’s Gardasil vaccine as
a case in point, an investigation documents Big Pharma’s near-total control of
governmental health agency decisions and the utter lack of concern by the
decision makers. However, some scientists are speaking out, and here’s what
they have to say.
Researchers are speaking out about the corruption in science with
regard to vaccines. Certainly, they’re in the minority, but their expertise and
solid evidence for their claims are resulting in both their studies and their
concerns being published in medical journals.
The arena of vaccination, which has been adversely affecting so
many children, is now a centerpoint for documenting how Big Pharma has taken
over so much of science, resulting in outright fraud that’s used to promote
their products. Scientists Lucija Tomljenovic, Christopher A. Shaw, Judy
Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, and Toni Bark use the example of Merck’s Gardasil, a
human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, to demonstrate the point that HPV vaccine
activism is not based on science, but instead on misrepresentations of science.
In a letter signed by all five of these scientists, they point out
several flaws in the claims that Merck’s Gardasil and Pfizer’s Cervarix make to
sell their vaccines[1]:
1.
HPV vaccines have never been shown to prevent cervical cancer.
2. The end-points used
in the studies are based on infections and lesions that usually heal without
help, so how can they demonstrate efficacy in preventing cancer several years
later?
3. The trials are biased
to produce false negatives and therefore cannot accurately estimate the risk of
developing cancer.
4. Passive methods of
recording adverse effects cannot accurately reflect how prevalent they are.
5. Accurate estimates of
the actual frequency of HPV vaccine adverse effects cannot be made when such
effects are automatically dismissed as unrelated to the vaccine.
6. Women are not
informed that, in some instances, the HPV vaccines may increase the rate at
which existing abnormalities develop, thus causing the cancer from which
they’re supposedly being protected.
7. When information
about HPV vaccine risks and limitations are not provided, women cannot possibly
make informed decisions about whether to have the vaccine.
8. Health regulators are
making decisions based on information provided by the same corporations that hope
to profit from them. How can they possibly make rational decisions on such
limited and biased information?
Investigation into Merck’s Murky
Dealings with Government
“Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in State Vaccination Policymaking”
is an investigation into the lobbying efforts by Merck to promote the HPV
vaccine, Gardasil.[2] It states:
Merck engaged in direct lobbying to
varying degrees in all of the states we studied. Merck proactively contacted
legislators to discuss strategies to maximize uptake of Gardasil, either
directly through company employees or by using local political consultants,
prominent physicians, or public relations firms.
Many
respondents reported that company representatives proposed specific
legislation, often drafting the bills and searching for a sponsor. In most
states, their efforts focused on a school-entry mandate. Respondents pointed
out that Merck’s activities were not unusual, although the public seemed to
have been unaware that private companies played such a role in the legislative
process. One commented, “Just about every vaccine mandate that we have
lately has been the result, at least partially, of the drug industry’s
efforts.” [Emphasis mine.]
They asked respondents, who included legislators, health
officials, medical professional organizations, advocacy organizations,
journalists, health insurers, and clinical researchers, what role
pharmaceutical manufacturers should play. The respondents believed that
pharmaceutical manufacturers should provide scientific information about the
products they push and that it was appropriate for Merck reps to sit on task
forces and committee meetings. Worse, though, not one person felt that there
was any problem in Merck’s drafting legislation!
In my reading of the paper, it appeared that the respondents
tended to hide behind the fact that Merck donated some vaccine, though there
were a few who found Merck’s involvement to be inappropriate.
Women in Government (WIG) received funding from Merck, which some
respondents felt was just fine, though opinions did vary on that point. It
should come as no surprise that WIG heavily promoted implementation of the
Gardasil vaccine.[3]
The investigation documented the extremely disturbing influence
that pharmaceutical corporations have in governmental health decisions that
affect us all.
Response to Investigation into
Merck’s Influence in Government
“Who Profits from Uncritical Acceptance of Biased Estimates of
Vaccine Efficacy and Safety?”[4] is a definitive statement
regarding Merck’s influence in vaccine policy. Tomljenovic and Shaw state:
… [C]areful scrutiny of Gardasil
clinical trials shows that their design, as well as data reporting and
interpretation, were largely inadequate.
They go on to delineate that optimism about Gardasil’s clinical
benefits rests “on an extremely weak base built on a number of untested
assumptions and significant misinterpretation of factual evidence.” They cite
these examples:
§
The claim that Gardasil will result in a 70% reduction in cervical
cancer is made in spite of there being no clinical data to support it.
§ The claim that
life-long protection is provided by three vaccine doses has no basis in fact,
as studies lasted, at most, five years.
§ The claim that
Gardasil’s adverse effects are minor are supported only by “highly flawed
safety trial design”.
§ They also point out
“evidence of biased and selective reporting of results from clinical trials”.
Their conclusion is:
Keeping in mind that “the primary
interest of a pharmaceutical company is developing and selling
pharmaceutical product,” one must ask whether rational vaccine policy
decisions should be based on conclusions derived from an uncritical
acceptance of flawed vaccine safety and efficacy estimates provided by the
vaccine manufacturer. Failure to adhere to principles
of evidence-based medicine with respect to Gardasil promotion and
vaccination policymaking inevitably raises the question of whether
we have learned anything from the Vioxx debacle.
Indeed! It most assuredly does look like nothing has been learned
from past disastrous destruction of lives by Big Pharma. Just how many times
must we go through such agony? The toll Gardasil has been taking is being swept
under the table, but the evidence is growing, as Tomljenovic and Shaw have been
documenting in their research.
How many more must suffer before we step back from the
pharmaceutical juggernaut and refuse to let them manipulate and control our
healthcare system?
These
articles contain more information on Tomljenovic and Shaw’s research:
§
Sources:
1.
HPV vaccines and cancer prevention,
science versus activism, Infectious Agents and Cancer, Lucija
Tomljenovic, Judy Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, Toni Bark, Christopher A.
Shaw; doi:10.1186/1750-9378-8-6
2.
Pharmaceutical Companies’ Role in
State Vaccination Policymaking, American Journal of Public Health (on Medscape), Michelle
M. Mello, JD, PhD, Sara Abiola, JD, PhD, James Colgrove, PhD
4.
Who Profits from Uncritical Acceptance of Biased Estimates
of Vaccine Efficacy and Safety?, American Journal of Public Health, Lucija Tomljenovic and
Christopher A. Shaw; doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300837
  |
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Japan Withdraws Support For HPV Vaccines Due To Infertility Side Effects And Citizens Petition For The Ban of Gardasil and Cervarix.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment