Katie Couric Opened The HPV/Gardasil Pandora’s
Box And Discussion; Now Maybe People Will Begin To Examine The Truth About
This Vaccine, Its Questionable Value, Bottom Line Merchandising, Shoddy
Testing And Meaningless Follow Up Data.
Please Take The Time To Read The Entirety Of
This Post; It Might Save Your Son Or Daughter.
On
Wednesday December 4,
Katie Couric used her daytime TV platform to
interview distraught mothers, Emily Tarsell, who blamed her daughters’ death on the HPV
vaccine Gardasil and Rosemary Mathis who believes that her daughter had been injured by this vaccine.
Their attacks were pretty much the standard fare in today’s world of politics. They attacked Couric as if she was a political candidate and demeaned her in every way possible.
The
establishment media went into a massive frenzy in defense of Merck, The CDC
and The FDA. That is what I call a true establishment lineup, all having less
then creditable credentials these days/
Their
attacks were pretty the standard fare in today’s world of politics. They
attacked Couric as she was a political candidate and demeaned her in every way
possible.
They
demonized the parents, dismissed their stories and cherry picked reports that
have been brought into such scrutiny before that they should have dismissed.
How dare
anyone question the efficacy of the Gardasil Vaccine. After all it has been
under attack and the subject of investigation and/or rejection in such places
as: Japan, India, etc., and most recently in the State of Utah.
Attacks designed to discredit Ms. Couric include such headings
as: “Vaccine Disinformation: Katie Couric on HPV and Jenny McCarthy on
Autism,” , “Katie Couric Feeds the HPV Vaccine ‘Controversy.’” “Has Couric
Lost Her Cred on HPV?”
It didn’t stop there. Everyone involved was accused of being
anti-scientific, as if scientists are above question and local doctors are
infallible and the most knowledgeable in these matters. If that be true then
my personal Physician who will not give the vaccine is right; case closed!
When has it become almost criminal to explore an issue that has
been successfully swept under the rug in The USA for years?
Forgive me; I forgot that our Government and is several
Department and agencies have become puppets of Corporate America, and anyone
willing to challenge that statement bring it on. I am ready.
It is not new that public discussions of things that
establishment institutions would rather never see the day of light are
attacked with a vengeance and all involved are savaged with every term of
derision, demonization, diminution and dismissal.
I should know as I am a political practitioner and can determine
the rot and smell of the backroom spin and attack agents at work.
My Lord,
the PR Media went in to hysterics over the fact that Couric had the audacity
to bring Dr. Diane Harper, a professor at the University of Louisville and
leading HPV expert, to provide insight into why she did a complete 180 on the
vaccine. We all know to do such things is treason in the political world and
heresy in the scientific world.
“What I believe has been promoted by the FDA is a system that is grossly
inadequate to ascertain the safety of any drug, vaccine or medical device.
This has led to so many products that have been touted to be safe left on the
market where I feel in reality are highly dangerous.
This is how this applies to the HPV vaccines. I am going to reference the information about the Gardasil vaccine as the prime example of this underreporting and how it is used to promote the vaccine. In their documents they will use the present numbers as to how many individuals reported an adverse event to the VAERS data base. Presently, as of October 13, 2013, there have been 32,179 reports. They will insinuate this number as fact per the whole population of vaccines distributed.
What they do not bring up is that this
could only be 1% as they attest to as the amount that really reports. So what
this gives us if you multiply this by 100% is in realty 3,217,900 has
suffered an adverse event from the vaccine. This could also be on the low end
because from my conversations with hundreds of parents and individuals over
the years I can safely say that I believe that this is only the tip of the
iceberg.
They will also downplay the deaths that have been reported. Presently there have been 148 young people who have died with relation to this vaccine. If you use what they stated of 1% you really have 14,800 have died. The only problem that I see in this is that all the parents that I have spoken with have told me that the autopsy reports were inconclusive as to a cause so I believe that this number has the real possibility to be double if not triple the amount I have stated above. This in itself should be cause to remove this vaccine from distribution. I cringe and wonder and pray that when I read a news report of some young person suddenly dying for some unknown reason did not receive the HPV vaccine. Another way they will skew the real numbers is what they did for the reports to the FDA. You will hear often that the percentage of adverse events reported for the vaccine compared to the placebo was comparable. In the report to the FDA on September 11th, 2008 this is what the reporter wrote. "Reviewer's Comment: The proportions of subjects in each System Organ Class were comparable. The most common conditions reported were pharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and influenza. There was a higher proportion of subjects with abdominal pain in the Gardasil group (5.0%) as compared to the saline placebo group (2.7%)." (3) The reality of this statement with relation to table 79, New Medical Conditions After Day 1..., it is referencing is this. Out of 11,778 participants that received the Gardasil vaccination 8,628 (73.3%) reported a new medical history during the study. In the placebo group out of 9,686 participants 7,390 (76.3%) reported a new medical history during the study. So what the FDA says to you is that there was only a 3.0% difference between the vaccine group and the placebo group. If you look at this that is a small margin but if you look at the real numbers reported which is the 73.3% that is huge. Can you imagine that 3 out of 4 young people receiving this vaccine are expected to have a new medical condition when the real numbers are known and this is acceptable to the FDA, CDC and all the other organizations that use this data? It is because of what these organizations tell us that I can safely say that the HPV vaccine has the potential to be the worse vaccine ever created because by their own admission they promote the under reporting of adverse events, do not encourage doctors to report and omit vital statistics when promoting the safety of this vaccine to the public. How can this make you feel confident in the practices of the FDA? From what I have learned over the years I have a '0%' confidence level in regards to anything that they do.”  
Sadly, our story of pain, adversity, and medical mysteries did
not begin with the Gardasil vaccine. My 18 year old Autistic daughter
Jenni has struggled with pain and challenges from day one.
As a newborn, she was extremely irritable and diagnosed with
colic. As an infant, she was highly sensitive to noises and continued
to suffer with symptoms of colic. Before her first birthday, Jennifer
had already begun occupational and physical therapy for fine and gross motor
delays and low muscle tone. One month before her first birthday, she
suffered a grand mal seizure and would continue to have several more grand
mal seizures over the course of the next two months.
After a year of anti-seizure medication, and significant
developmental delay, Jennifer was weaned off the medication and would only
suffer two more grand mal seizure at ages 3 and 9. Seizures,
developmental delay, constant irritability, and sensory defensiveness were
just the beginning of what would be a lifetime of challenges.
Does this sound like a person who should be offered a highly
toxic vaccine for HPV?
If I had known that a series of three Gardasil shots we began
in January of 2009 and ended in September of 2009 would add more pain,
misery, and potentially dangerous side effects, I would never had allowed the
injections.
I had always kept my children up to date with their vaccines
and trusted that our doctor wouldn’t suggest anything that could have a
negative effect on my daughter’s already fragile system. In my opinion,
the medical staff should have been aware of the adverse reactions that many
girls were experiencing. I believe they should have known my daughter’s
history of seizures showed she should have never been offered the vaccine.
Before this doctor’s visit, I had never heard of Gardasil and
had no reason to suspect any problems.
Since October of 2009, Jennifer has been a professional
patient. Here is a list of her symptoms:
§ chronic low grade
fever
§ headaches (
mostly sharp pain on one side)
§ nausea
§ abdominal pains
§ dizziness
§ blurred vision
§ heart problems
(heart racing, “hearing her pulse in her head”)
§ leg
pains/tingling
§ knee/joint
problems
§ fatigue
§ vaginal
irritations and itching
Visits to specialists and return visits to our primary care
were a regular part of our monthly routine for several years. Jennifer
is never well! Constantly fatigued, dizzy, nauseous, confused, and
feels hopeless that she will never feel better. She’s dealt with
episodes of high anxiety and fears because of her heart rate and unexplainable
sensations such as “popping” in her head and body.
Prior to 2009, Jennifer was rarely sick, and her visits to a
doctor were few and far between. All of her tests return normal
results! Her life is anything but normal.
Jennifer had an episode the year after Gardasil where she
“blacked out” for a few seconds and fell backwards, injuring her knee and
preventing her from walking without pain ever since.
She’s also had times where she says she feels like her eyes
are rolling back into her head and that she feels “strange”. One of the
biggest challenges with Jennifer’s autism, is that she doesn’t report her
symptoms very well and I have to question her thoroughly to understand
exactly what she is feeling.
Looking back, I feel horrible about her first year of suffering
because I didn’t realize how bad her pain was and thought she was just being
extra sensitive.
For me, the hardest thing to accept is that I am to blame for
allowing this vaccine to enter her body. I should have known more, I
should have asked more questions, I should have been given more information.
When Jennifer is feeling scared, or just laying in bed dealing
with a headache, or stomach problems, I often join her and snuggle in close
and tell her how sorry I am that she’s in pain, and that I’ll never stop
trying to find a way to make her feel better.
I also tell her that we’re helping others now by warning them
of the dangers of Gardasil and that hopefully we can save them from going
through the same pain and suffering.
My daughter hates it when I speak about the new
medical conditions she has been suffering through since being vaccinated with
Gardasil so I have chosen to remain anonymous to help keep the peace. I chose
to give her this vaccine in an effort to help protect her. I struggle with
that decision every day.
She had just finished a great soccer season. She had
turned 13 already and like always time had slipped away from us. I was a
month or 2 late on getting her annual check-up. Her pediatrician had been
discussing the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, with me since she turned 11 years old.
I put it off and put it off and then finally agreed to move forward with the
injections we thought would protect her from cervical cancer.
Within a month or so, I started to notice changes with
her. I even mentioned to people that all she ever wants to eat was junk food.
It was like a switch was flipped in her body. She was an easy kid that loved
food and always ate all sorts of foods including her vegetables. She traded
in all of her good eating habits and frantically searched for junk food in
the cabinets. I caught her eating leftover holiday candy that was months old
and never thrown away; and boxes of cake mix by the spoonful and never mixing
it into a batter or baking it. She would eat the whole box of dry mix…… in
one sitting! She would take cocoa powder and mix it with sugar and melt it
into syrup and eat it by the spoonful.
She suddenly had a new love for pasta. She wanted it day
and night. Bizarre food behaviors that I had never seen exhibited before
became the norm. She was always stick figure skinny and I would mention to
her you better watch what you are doing all that is going to catch up with you.
While this was going on I also noticed that she would
sit around the house a lot. She was always active in sports or horseback
riding and now she would just sit on the couch. She never walked around the
house – she always used to run through the hallways. This all stopped.
She also became emotionally hypersensitive, crying over
the most minor of things. She would burst into tears if she didn’t like what
I was making for dinner or couldn’t find something to wear. I mentioned
this to people but just chalked it up to changing hormones and her now being
a teenager. This behavior went on for a while.
She then developed insomnia. She kept saying, “Mom, I’m
not sleeping at night.”
She would come home from school and take naps. I would
let her nap because I knew she wasn’t sleeping at night. I then started
to exercise with her thinking that maybe her body is just not tired and
that’s why she couldn’t sleep. It didn’t help. She could barely muster up the
energy to walk around the block.
After about 4-6 weeks of trying different relaxation
techniques to help her get some sleep, and with things getting worse, I took
her to the pediatrician. It had been almost a year since her prior visit. She
had gained 30 pounds. I knew she had put on weight, but she wore it well and
I never imagined it to be that amount. Even the doctor questioned how could
this be right?
He recommended she take some vitamin melatonin to help
her sleep and sent her in for her 2nd dose of Gardasil. She let out a blood
curdling scream when they jabbed her – something she had never done before.
She had always been one of the toughest kids I knew. Typically, she
would just suck it up.
After about a week with no success with the melatonin, I
would catch her falling asleep constantly. She would take a 2 hour nap after
school and would then go to bed at 9pm. She would start to tell me a story
and her eyes would start to close and her words would become garbled. Her
speech became so distorted it was like she was drunk or on heavy drugs.
It would last for about a minute and would then just go away.
I wondered if she was doing drugs. A friend of mine said
she’s not the type, there’s something else going on.
She developed a buckling in one of her knees and with
her lack of activity I told her she probably just needed some strengthening
exercises in her knee.
While sitting at family dinner one night she lifted her
glass up and her hand started to tremble almost dropping the glass. She then
got up and started walking to her room, her knees gave out and she grabbed
onto the only thing she could, the wall. With her arms planted on the wall
above her head she slid down the wall and collapsed on the floor. She laid
there speechless for about a minute and then said she was so tired. I helped
her to bed.
She slept until the next morning and got up and said she
was still so tired. I let her stay home from school and sleep most of the day
away thankful that she was finally getting some rest and maybe she could get
over the insomnia.
The following morning she had another garbled speech
eyes closing episode. I packed her up and took her to Joe DiMaggio
Children’s Hospital emergency room in Hollywood, FL. I described these
episodes as almost seizure like. The ER doctor went through her history and
got to the question of recent vaccines.
I snapped my finger and pointed at the doctor and
screamed out GARDASIL!
The doctor looked at me and said, “I guarantee that has
something to do with what’s going on.”
She spent 7 days in the hospital undergoing every test
imaginable. They even wanted to remove her braces because they were causing
interference on some of the tests. She kept having trouble with her knees
buckling while in the hospital and having episodes of eyes closing and
garbled speech. The episodes were getting worse.
She wouldn’t let me video tape her and the doctors were
never around to witness this. By day 5, there was talk of a discharge without
a diagnosis. The doctors recommended my daughter stay home until some
test results came back. I was told she would be discharged with a safety plan
that included a walker and wearing a bike helmet around the house so she
wouldn’t hit her head if she collapsed.
They sent in a 3rd neurologist. I told the doctor to sit
here for an hour and WATCH my daughter. I said,
“If you discharge
her, I will drive straight to Miami children’s hospital. I don’t care if they
start repeating tests, she’s not going home! Especially with that ridiculous
safety plan!”
Shortly after, my daughter had a full blown seizure-like
episode in front of the doctor. The doctor questioned her a little more about
her symptoms and diagnosed her with Narcolepsy with Cataplexy.
Narcolepsy is an autoimmune disease that causes your
sleep/wake cycle to be disrupted. Cataplexy is a common symptom of Narcolepsy
which causes loss of muscle tone resulting in her collapsing. Cataplexy also
causes hypersensitivity to emotion which explained why she was previously
bursting into tears over nothing.
The doctor started to discuss emotion induced cataplexy
and my daughter stated when she laughs or gets upset she gets weak and her
body gives out. She ordered a spinal tap and a blood test to confirm the
diagnosis.
I asked the doctor if she thought this was related to
Gardasil and she answered, “Absolutely.”
She was given immunoglobulin therapy (IVIG) as this has
been known to help with auto-immune disorders and discharged on day 7.
People that I knew thought because she was discharged,
then she must be better. The therapy did nothing. She was no better than the
day I took her to the hospital. As a matter of fact, she was worse. She
continued to collapse at home.
I likened it to anaphylactic shock. After she would
collapse and while lying on the ground unable to move, she would beg me to
take her back to the hospital. I called the doctors and was told to give it a
week. Nothing changed.
She had missed weeks of school at this point. I returned
her to the neuro. As there is not a specific medicine for narcolepsy she was
placed on ADHD medicine for performance enhancement during the day, and sleep
medicine at night. Her insomnia still remains to this day.
The doctor had ruled out any incidence of contracting
the strep virus or trauma with my daughter and started to explain how
narcolepsy is induced.
It takes a genetic predisposition and an environmental
component to induce the disease. A hormone in her body has been depleted.
It’s called orexin, it’s also known as hypocretin. Currently there is no
medicinal method to restore this hormone in the body.
The spinal tap ultimately revealed there was a genetic
disposition to the disease in her body and the blood test led to 100%
confirmation of the disease. Many of my family members had never heard of the
disease let alone knew any family members that ever had it.
The doctors point to the vaccine as the environmental
factor triggering her conditions as all other sources were ruled out.
They said to me the vaccine has been known to cause
autoimmune disorders.
Because she was having insomnia before the 2nd dose and
wasn’t being treated by the doctors before the 2nd dose, they will only put
in writing that her disease was enhanced by the 2nd dose of the vaccine.
But, they acknowledge that all her symptoms with
exception of insomnia were brought to the forefront after the 2nd dose.
Enhanced adverse reactions after the second and third injections seem to be a
common occurrence with HPV vaccines and this is exactly what transpired with
my daughter.
She lives her life on a vicious cycle of meds to keep
her awake and meds to make her go to sleep. Struggling all the while as even
with meds she is about 75% of the kid she once.
I have tried vitamins, holistic care, & chiropractic
care, and nothing other than prescription meds have helped this child.
Without medicine her symptoms have become debilitating. She can stay awake
for only 2-3 hours a day and those aren’t quality hours. She can barely walk
as she is exhausted or the cataplexy sets in and she collapses. Still to this
day she has to nap during the day and when she laughs or gets mad her body gives
out on her.
She has learned to recognize how this feels though and
catches herself before she collapses. She still craves junk food as we all do
when we are exhausted. We reach for carbs in an effort to boost up the energy
level.
Prior to this diagnosis she was a strong healthy kid
with the exception of being born with a congenital cataract and sadly losing
vision in one of her eyes. I feel as if lightning has now struck this poor
child twice as she now struggles with life and with school as this is a very
hard disease to manage.
One decision has changed her life. Hopefully not forever
as Narcolepsy has ongoing research and I am hopeful that a cure will be in
the works very soon. The doctors think 5-10 years.
Currently she is struggling in school and almost all of
her activities that she used to be actively involved in have ceased.
Until there is a remedy I will continue to try and “fix
her” as her life has been stolen away from her.
In 2011 Caitlin was vaccinated with the HPV
vaccine, Cervarix. On October 5th she got her third
shot. Five days later Caitlin was in the bathroom and became very dizzy. She
could barely stand on her feet. I called the doctor immediately and asked him
if it could have something to do with the HPV vaccination. The doctor said
that it was impossible.
Caitlin got ill, she got the flu. She recovered and got
ill again, recovered again and that continued for a while. However, the times
she stayed ill became longer and the intervals when she was not ill
became shorter.
On December 22nd she had her blood
checked again and they found out that it was related to a viral infection, a
cold, a flu.
Medicines were not necessary. But Caitlin was constantly
sleeping. She was very nauseous. She had headaches, no appetite and was
extremely tired.
I had a growing suspicion that this was caused by the
vaccination.
Again I asked the
doctor if there were other girls with similar complaints, and if there could
be a connection to the vaccine. According to her that was impossible because
the vaccine was safe, tested and no side effects were known. A discussion
followed but I learned nothing.
So we went to the pediatrician for more blood tests. In
the local hospital an intestinal test and a blood test followed. The results
were negative. The doctor would contact Lareb, the Dutch Government’s center
for medical side effects research and statistics.
Lareb notified us that there were some girls at that age
with similar complaints, but that those could be related to hormones.
Meanwhile I was bringing Caitlin to school by car
because bicycling had become too strenuous for her.
Then I read an article in a Dutch newspaper, The Telegraaf, – “Agony after girl shot” – I
went to a homeopath. He noted that her lymphatic and nervous system were not
functioning properly. Her ‘battery’ was not recharging.
She went under treatment by this doctor and in March,
April she recovered. In the summer she improved so significantly that she was
already doing her flyer rounds again.
But in September the flu returned and she wasn’t
recovering. It was the same story all over again. No energy, lots of
headaches, back to the doctor, more blood tests.
We got a reference to the University Hospital in Gent,
Belgium. A pediatrician tested her for viruses and bacteria. There was a
suspicion of Lyme disease, the symptoms were much like the symptoms
associated with Lyme disease. She got a brain scan because of her headaches
but the neurologist couldn’t find anything either.
They thought the link with the HPV vaccine was
far-fetched. She would have to rehabilitate.
But I asked: “If she doesn’t have anything why would she
need rehabilitation?” In the rehabilitation she would have to learn how to cope
with the CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) so she could learn her boundaries.
But she had known her boundaries for a year.
The doctor in the hospital did mention that there was a
lot of chemistry in her body, and that something could possibly have gone wrong
with that.
My daughter has no social life anymore. Parties and
school camps go past her. My 10 year old daughter goes to bed later than my
15 year old.
Sometimes I can’t wake her up and I really have to shake
her to wake her up and after dinner she almost falls asleep at the table.
I have talked to the community health service.
Everywhere you get a no, no, no for an answer. Then I looked at the internet.
It occurred to me that very many girls have the same symptoms of dizziness
and nausea. She has extreme headaches, can’t bear sounds and bright lights.
Now, 2 years passed by and I keep saying that all this
has something to do with the HPV vaccine, but I can’t prove anything.
Meanwhile we got a new family doctor, so I thought,
let’s try again. Maybe he has a different opinion. But no, Caitlin is a
special case, they have never heard of it. Maybe it’s puberty, maybe
hormones. Of course my daughter has had the flu before, but it was only after
the HPV vaccine things got really bad.
I have seen it myself, I saw it happen. I write
everything down. Lareb is a good institute, but if none of those 7 doctors we
visited makes a report and sends it to Lareb, it’s all useless.
For Lareb we are a number, but for me it is my daughter.
I feel so sorry that I gave her that HPV shot.
Now, when we visit a doctor they ask us if the home
situation is okay, or is she comfortable in her skin, or is someone teasing
her at school. If she has psychological complaints she also gets physical
symptoms.
But I know exactly when the symptoms started. She has
physical complaints and they can result in psychological complaints if we go
on like this for much longer.
We have given her all of the prescribed vaccinations.
You get a call and you give your child the vaccinations with the best intentions,
right?
We had just lost people in the family to cancer and just
after that we got the flyer about the HPV vaccine and how this vaccine should
protect against cancer. So we thought, that’s good. Is this good
government information? I didn’t know. I didn’t have enough information for
the HPV vaccine.
There was no mention of side effects at all, simply that
it was good for you because it protected against cervical cancer. Read this story in French here.
The
HPV Vaccine Debate: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
Katie Couric opened up a Pandora’s
box of sorts simply by airing testimony about the HPV vaccine’s lack of
effectiveness and safety, but shouldn’t she be commended for asking questions
the mainstream media is afraid to touch?
We live in a time when simply questioning the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines has become, in the eyes of the mainstream media and
conventional medical establishment, an unconscionable act. With high-profile
figures like Bill Gates stating that those who engage in “anti-vaccine efforts … kill
children,” and global health organizations like UNICEF immodestly spying on independent health sites (and
their visitors) who they allege spread misinformation and “anti-vaccine
sentiment,” the increasing inquisitiveness about vaccines among the public
and research community alike has become the object of a modern day
Inquisition.
And yet, were we to stop questioning, suspending our critical
thinking and deferring medical decisions of life and death importance to a
greater power — no matter how ‘evidence-based’ we believe that authority to
be — we would actually be engaging in a faith-based practice; hardly a defensible
position from the perspective of rational, informed choice.
What could be so wrong with asking questions, especially from
those who have had direct experiences with vaccines, either as vaccine
recipients or as professional researchers?
Take Katie Couric’s recent show about the
human papilloma vaccine (HPV) vaccine as an example…
Both painted a picture of the vaccine entirely at odds with the
one projected by the health authorities like the CDC, who promulgate the
overly simplified narrative, ceaselessly echoed in the mainstream media and
the public mind, ‘HPV causes cancer,’ ‘HPV vaccines offer the best
protection,” and ‘HPV vaccines are safe,’
This uniquely critical discussion resulted in a huge backlash
among those whose religion, it seems, is to promote vaccination as the
infallible holy water of the modern age, spurring them to label Katie Couric
as a ‘vaccine denialist,’ ‘misinformant,’ and ‘the next Jenny McCarthy.’
The scientific truth, no matter how heretical it sounds, is that
HPV by itself does not “cause” cervical cancer (as if anything in the
universe were an effect of a singular cause!). There are manifold
environmental, nutritional and lifestyle factors, not the least of which the
status of the infected person’s immune system, which determine whether or not
an HPV infection will develop into a life-threatening condition such as
cervical cancer.
The immune system, in fact, plays such a critical role that,
despite the dumbed down marketing copy, memes, and fear-mongering mentality,
most HPV-associated lesions regress spontaneously with timewhen you do nothing at all (i.e. expectant management).
For instance, back in 2004, Lancet published a study which found
that low-grade squamous intra-epithelial cervical lesions (LSIL) commonly associated
with HPV infection spontaneously regress in 61% of females within 12 months
and 91% within 36 months.[i] LSIL is considered a mild form of
cervical dysplasia (CIN), but is nonetheless often subject to more aggressive
measures such as a colposcopy with biopsy,[ii] which sometimes leads to surgical
treatment.
Another 2010 study published in the European
Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology found that at the end of 12 months
of follow-up, the CIN 2 regression rate was 74% (31/42), progression rate to
CIN 3 was 24% (10/42) and in one case CIN 2 persisted (2%). Finally, a
2011 study in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Diseases found At 12 months, 70% of CIN 1 and
54% of CIN 2 lesions spontaneously regressed (p< .001).[iii]
The odds therefore are clearly in the favor of HPV-associated
abnormal cell changes (so-called ‘precancerous’ lesions) regressing naturally
like most self-limiting viral infections. Vaccines are clearly not
responsible for the ‘protection’ conferred by our inbuilt immunity; nor is
the HPV virus some inevitable force of lethality that only universal HPV
vaccination campaigns can effectively countermand.
When we listen closely to Katie Couric’s interview of Dr.
Harper, who has earned her status as an authority
on the topic by being an integral part of the
science that brought HPV
vaccine into human trials, we find her making the following rarely
articulated points:
Gardasil doesn’t last long enough (only 5
years) to prevent cervical cancer, which takes a decade or longer to develop.
(3:40
HPV infections are something that women
continue to get throughout their lifetimes (3:46)
CDC and other published data show that between
the age of birth and 11 years old age 10-15% of these children are already
infected with these high-risk types.
So, if Dr. Harper is correct, and the short-lived, at best
5-year long protection derived from HPV vaccines only works in 90% of the
11-12 year olds who haven’t already contracted one of the HPV
vaccine specific strains, how can the CDC in good conscience make the
following inadequately qualified statement:
“HPV vaccines offer
the best protection to
girls and boys who receive all three vaccine doses and have time to develop
an immune response before being sexually active with another person. That’s
why HPV vaccination is recommended for preteen girls and boys at age 11 or 12
years.”? [Source: CDC]
It is clear from the FAQs on there own website that, “HPV vaccines will not treat
or get rid of existing HPV infections. Also, HPV vaccines do not treat or
cure health problems (like cancer or warts) caused by an HPV infection that
occurred before vaccination.”
And what
of other factors that prevent or accelerate HPV-associated cervical cancer
progression?
We know basic chemical and hormonal exposures play a role. There
is evidence that oral contraceptives,[iv] breast augmentation,[v] and even the highly touted
anti-breast cancer drug tamoxifen may increase the risk of cervical cancer.[vi]
There is also plenty of evidence that basic nutritional factors, such as
B-vitamins,[vii] [viii]indole-3-carbinol
(found in Cruciferous veggies),[ix] [x]turmeric
(curcumin),[xi] lycopene,[xii] reduce the risk, or may even regress
these cancerous and/or precancerous growths.
The point? HPV-associated cervical cancer does not occur in an
etiological vacuum. Natural immunity, nutrition and chemical exposures – NONE
of which have anything to do with a vaccine – are far more important.
But what
may be even more damning to the HPV vaccine are the basic facts of HPV
virology itself…
According to the CDC’s website, there are over 100 forms of HPV
that have been identified thus far, with the vaccine only protecting (in
theory) against four, namely, HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18.[xiii]
Nor does vaccination speed the clearance of pre-existing HPV 16/18 infection,
making Dr. Harper’s point about the prevalence of HPV infection in those
younger than 11 all the more poignant.[xiv] So, how effective can a 2-4 strain
vaccine possibly be even if it works 100% of the time against them?
Another surprising revelation about HPV and the vaccine surfaced
on Medline Plus, the National Institute of Health’s website, last month. Researchers
from Duke University found that although African-American women are twice
as likely as
Caucasian women to die from cervical cancer, HPV vaccines target strains of
HPV that are far less likely to infect them, and are not found in the most
concerning precancerous abnormalities. According to a report on Afro.com:
“The study examined 280 Black women and 292 White women, all carrying
varying HPV strains. Some had no signs of cancer, some showed mild signs of
pre-cancer and a small percentage had advanced precancerous abnormalities. In
the group with the most advanced signs of pre-cancer, White participants
carried strains 16, 18, 33, 39, and 59, whereas Black participants carried
strains 31, 35, 45, 56, 58, 66, and 68.
Currently, two vaccines on the market target four HPV strains
considered most troublesome. Gardasil, which is produced by Merck and can be
administered to anyone aged 9 through 26, protects against strains 16, 18, 6,
and 11. Cervarix, by GlaxoSmithKline, is available only for girls and women
and targets strains 16 and 18.”
This discovery exemplifies what a shockingly non-evidence-based mess today’s HPV vaccine messaging
is, even when coming from the topmost authority on the ‘evidence-based’
medicine food chain.
With the added problem of ‘color blindness,’ it is clear that
HPV and HPV vaccine information needs to be reformulated immediately to
reflect the disparities in effectiveness between different racial groups,
especially since the most deeply afflicted population (black women) are least
protected.
After all, in order for there to exist informed choice, a proper
weighing of the risks and benefits must be made possible, which is what the
evidence in ‘evidence-based’ medicine is there for. Failing to make this
evidence available, or misrepresenting and/or concealing it, not only
violates the medico-ethical principle of informed consent, but in light of
the race-specificity of HPV strain infectivity, would be an act of racial
discrimination, with dire consequences to the most at risk populations.
Consider too that post-marketing surveillance has revealed that
the HPV vaccine causes noticeable
adverse effects in
the majority of women who receive them.[xv] And this only scratches the surface
of the problem, as signaled within the published literature.[xvi] For a vaccine that may have offer no
health benefits to the African-American women who receive them, this is no
small problem.
Ultimately, the HPV vaccine does not work as advertised, and
likely never did. For those who continue to distract from this fact,
resorting to assaulting the character of those like Katie Couric who provide
a forum for discussing these vitally important issues, the evidence itself
will only blow back on them. HPV is not the sole cause of cervical cancer,
the HPV vaccine’s effectiveness* is either poor or non-existent in certain
populations, and reports of adverse effects continue to amass on VAERS
including death and chronic disability?.
*Moreover, its effectiveness is based on a cellular changes
associated with but not causative of cancer. In fact, given the dearth of
long-term data, no effectiveness at cancer protection can be asserted.
[i] Anna-Barbara
Moscicki, Stephen Shiboski, Nancy K Hills, Kimberly J Powell, Naomi Jay,
Evelyn N Hanson, Susanna Miller, K Lisa Canjura-Clayton, Sepidah Farhat,
Jeanette M Broering, Teresa M Darragh.Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions
in young women.Lancet. 2004 Nov 6-12;364(9446):1678-83.
PMID: 15530628
[ii] Wright TC
Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D (Oct 2007).
“2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical
cancer screening tests”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 (4):
346–55.
[iii] Gloria Y F
Ho, Mark H Einstein, Seymour L Romney, Anna S Kadish, Maria Abadi, Magdy
Mikhail, Jayasri Basu, Benjamin Thysen, Laura Reimers, Prabhudas R Palan,
Shelly Trim, Nafisseh Soroudi, Robert D Burk,. Risk factors for persistent cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia grades 1 and 2: managed by watchful waiting. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Oct
;15(4):268-75. PMID: 21811178
[iv] Paul
Appleby, Valerie Beral, Amy Berrington de González, Didier Colin, Silvia
Franceschi, Adrian Goodhill, Jane Green, Julian Peto, Martyn Plummer, Siân
Sweetland. Cervical cancer and hormonal
contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women
with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24
epidemiological studies. Lancet. 2007 Nov
10;370(9599):1609-21. PMID: 17993361
[v] L A
Brinton, J H Lubin, M C Burich, T Colton, S L Brown, R N Hoover. Cancer risk at sites other than the breast following
augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Epidemiol. 2001 May
;11(4):248-56. PMID:11306343
[vi] P Carthew,
R E Edwards, B M Nolan, E A Martin, R T Heydon, I N White, M J Tucker. Tamoxifen induces endometrial and vaginal cancer in rats
in the absence of endometrial hyperplasia.Carcinogenesis.
2000 Apr;21(4):793-7. PMID: 10753217
[vii] Chandrika
J Piyathilake, Suguna Badiga, Proma Paul, K Vijayaraghavan, Haripriya
Vedantham, Mrudula Sudula, Pavani Sowjanya, Gayatri Ramakrishna, Keerti V
Shah, Edward E Partridge, Patti E Gravitt. Indian women with higher serum
concentrations of folate and vitamin B12 are significantly less likely to be
infected with carcinogenic or high-risk (HR) types of human papillomaviruses
(HPVs).Int J Women Health. 2010;2:7-12. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
PMID:21072292
[viii] Rebecca L
Sedjo, Paula Inserra, Martha Abrahamsen, Robin B Harris, Denise J Roe, Susie
Baldwin, Anna R Giuliano. Human papillomavirus persistence and
nutrients involved in the methylation pathway among a cohort of young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.
2002 Apr;11(4):353-9. PMID:11927495
[ix] L Jin, M
Qi, D Z Chen, A Anderson, G Y Yang, J M Arbeit, K J Auborn. Indole-3-carbinol prevents cervical cancer in human
papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16) transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1999 Aug
15;59(16):3991-7. PMID: 10463597
[x] Mei Qi,
Ann E Anderson, Da-Zhi Chen, Shishinn Sun, Karen J Auborn. Indole-3-carbinol prevents PTEN loss in cervical cancer in
vivo. Lipids.
2011 Jan;46(1):37-46. Epub 2010 Nov 2. PMID:16557333
[xi] Diane M
Maher, Maria C Bell, Emmylu A O’Donnell, Brij K Gupta, Meena Jaggi, Subhash C
Chauhan.Curcumin
suppresses human papillomavirus oncoproteins, restores p53, Rb, and PTPN13
proteins and inhibits benzo[a]pyrene-induced upregulation of HPV E7. Mol Carcinog. 2011 Jan;50(1):47-57.
PMID: 21061268
[xii] Rebecca L
Sedjo, Mary R Papenfuss, Neal E Craft, Anna R Giuliano. Effect of plasma micronutrients on clearance of oncogenic
human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003
May;14(4):319-26. PMID: 12846362
[xiv] Allan
Hildesheim, Rolando Herrero, Sholom Wacholder, Ana C Rodriguez, Diane
Solomon, M Concepcion Bratti, John T Schiller, Paula Gonzalez, Gary Dubin,
Carolina Porras, Silvia E Jimenez, Douglas R Lowy,. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle
vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):743-53.
PMID:17699008
[xv] Stefania
Spila-Alegiani, Roberto Da Cas, Cristina Giambi, Roberto Raschetti, Stefania
Salmaso.[Human
papillomavirus vaccine register]. Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Jun
;104(6):262-6. PMID: 23801230
[xvi] GreenMedInfo.com, HPV Vaccine Data
The Pentagon’s
Vaccine Factories
December 17, 2013
Why is the Pentagon developing and
controlling vaccines? Will our troops become human guinea pigs for MIT’s
emerging vaccine to block stress and fear?
In the aftermath of 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks, the federal government
decided not to let that crisis “ go to waste.” Allegedly to “better protect”
civilians and troops against biochemical attacks, germ warfare, or pandemics
(including normal, seasonal flu), it put the Pentagon squarely in the vaccine
business.
The resulting initiative, embraced
by the Bush Administration and then further championed by the Obama Administration:
Realized the Pentagon’s seemingly
obsessive dream of acquiring its own factories in which to manufacture
vaccines;
Wasted nearly a billion taxpayer
dollars—against the
advice of government analysts;
Richly rewarded Big Pharma and
several members of Congress; and
Introduced terrifying possibilities
of state-mandated and -controlled vaccines, including mind control vaccines.
According to a 2009 analysis commissioned by the second Bush
Administration and conducted by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug
Development, there were two ways the government could ramp up its involvement
in protecting against bio-terrorism and epidemics: hire more private
contractors, or establish government-managed drug factories.
The analysis recommended the first
option, as it was “less costly and timelier than constructing and operating”
government-managed facilities. Option two was dubbed “the least viable,” as
government-run facilities would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to build
and operate, and even after paying for construction and operations, the
Pentagon would still have to “buy” the resulting products from the drug
companies operating the factories.
In view of this analysis, HHS continued
to spend millions and millions of dollars working with Big Pharma on vaccine
research and production, as they had previously. But the Pentagon wasn’t
satisfied: they were absolutely determined to build and control
their own vaccine factory—so much so that Assistant Secretary of
Defense Andrew C. Weber was quoted as saying, “I want one of
my own.”
The red flags here are immediately
apparent. Do we really want the military making and then forcing vaccines on
our troops, or even civilians? This is scary, not to mention a huge conflict
of interest. Those who make, evaluate, and mandate vaccines should never be
within one organization!
In addition, why would the
Pentagon—which has faced budget cuts in recent years—choose the most
expensive option, despite official recommendations against and its own
history of huge cost overruns?
Since 2006, the DOD’s $700 million
contract with DynPort Vaccine Co. to develop biodefense vaccines has not
resulted in a single drug approved by the FDA. This is perhaps the good
news. At least it means that vaccines haven’t been approved that should not
have been. We should be grateful, given the FDA’s history of shoddy drug approval!
Also, why would the Pentagon see
itself as being more qualified than HHS in knowing what
drugs and vaccines America “needs?” Do they know something we don’t?
Whatever the motives, the
Pentagon’s persistence paid off. Almost as alarming as the Pentagon’s new
drug production capabilities is how the project was funded.
At first, Congress wanted no part
of the project. In September 2011, the Senate Appropriations Committee nixed the entire $151.6 million for the Pentagon’s vaccine factory
initiative because it was “duplicative” of HHS’s programs. But just three
months later, a Senate–House conference committee approved $101.7 million, despite their concerns that these funds would be used for
“redundant” programs.
What changed in just 90 days?
Perhaps that answer can be found in looking where the factories were being built.
Members of Congress indirectly
benefit from having “pork barrel projects” built in or near their district:
they attract educated, skilled laborers; generate tax revenues; create jobs
(construction, for example); and improve the local economy. Of course, it’s
helpful to remind voters of these during election season.
Here, for example, are three
government-sponsored vaccine plants being either built or expanded. Note how
close they are to the districts of members of the House–Senate conference
committee that approved the DOD’s project budget:
$60
million contract to expand Novartis vaccine plant in Holly Springs, NC: The Novartis vaccine plant is just 2.5 miles—a five-minute drive—from Congressman
David Price’s (D-NC) district.
$176 million contract to Texas A&M University to build a
defense, research, development, and manufacturing complex. Four members of the
committee—three representatives and one senator—are from Texas. Claiming
responsibility for raising the prestige and allure of a major state
university would be a nice little campaign speech tidbit, no?
$358.9
million contract to build a vaccine plant for the exclusive use of the
Pentagon-directed manufacturing. Rep. Ander Crenshaw’s (R-FL) district is just a 45-minute drive away from the new factory, certainly close enough to
benefit from such a massive project.
This effort was also supported by
the Obama Administration, which “quietly shuffled” millions away from a budget to provide protective gear, tools to
decontaminate gear exposed to biochemicals, and detection systems for our
troops to fund the vaccine factory initiative.
The Pentagon’s self-production
capabilities are particularly disturbing given the emergence of mind-altering
vaccines. For example, MIT has discovered a possible “vaccine” against Post Traumatic Stress
Syndrome (PTSD). The drug blocks the body’s production of the hormone that
produces stress and fear. The implications of this drug are alarming: would
we be less sensitive to what situations we expose soldiers to if they’re
“immune” to PTSD? Could this vaccine eventually be made mandatory, and used
to reduce stress and fear in the entire population? What kind of long-term
consequences could there be to interfering with human chemistry to this
degree?
We have already noted the scandal of how the Pentagon has
handled soldiers returning from the battlefield with head injuries and PTSD.
The standard treatment involves anti-psychotic drugs which have never had FDA
approval for this use, which are unquestionably and extremely toxic, and
which entail serious behavioral risks.
Meanwhile the Pentagon refuses our
wounded troops the one therapy which is safe, effective, and FDA-approved
(although not for this specific application): hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).
Evidence for this therapy’s tremendous success is simply ignored, presumably
because there is no big drug company behind it or potential for profit.
As we pointed out in September, nearly every
hospital owns a hyperbaric oxygen chamber. Most of these sit empty and
unused. Why in the world should we keep our troops sick or in pain when we
have the means to ease and even reverse their condition?
We know that the government has a long history of crony capitalist arrangements
with Big Pharma to develop, procure, sell, and market vaccines. However, with
the president, Congress, and the Pentagon all investing in secretive,
expensive, and proven-to-be-unnecessary vaccine plants, perhaps we’ve turned
a disturbing new corner. The Pentagon should not be developing or controlling
vaccines, which are mandated by the state, both for soldiers and children.
MONDAY,
Oct. 28 (HealthDay News) -- Black women may get less protection than whites
from the vaccines recommended for preventing human papillomavirus (HPV),
which causes cervical cancer, a new study suggests.
The
currently available vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, don't target the types
of HPV infection found most often in black women, the study authors said.
Experts
have long believed that most cervical cancers are caused by persistent
infection with subtypes of the sexually transmitted virus known as HPV 16 and
HPV 18. These are the strains targeted by Gardasil and Cervarix. (Gardasil
also targets HPV 6 and HPV 11.)
But
black women tend to develop cancer of the cervix -- the lower part of the
uterus or womb -- and die from it more often than white women, even when
screening programs are similar, according to background information included
in the study. This led the researchers to wonder if blacks might be less
likely to benefit from vaccination.
"HPV
16 and 18 occur less frequently in African-Americans than in whites,"
said study researcher Cathrine Hoyo, associate professor of obstetrics and
gynecology at the Duke University School of Medicine.
Hoyo's
team looked at women who had abnormal results on Pap tests -- screenings to
detect precancerous cervical abnormalities.
Of
the nearly 600 women with Pap smear abnormalities in the study, about 86
percent had detectable HPV, Hoyo said.
"African-Americans
had half the HPV 16 and 18 frequency as whites did," said Hoyo, who is
scheduled to present the findings Monday at a conference of the American
Association for Cancer Research in National Harbor, Md.
The
findings, if replicated in larger studies, could call into question the
effectiveness of the current vaccines for all races, she said.
But
women should still get an HPV vaccine, said Dr. Robert Morgan, co-director of
the gynecological oncology program at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer
Center in Duarte, Calif. "I don't think recommendations on vaccination
would change [based] on this data," said Morgan, who was not involved in
the research.
The
American Cancer Society estimates that more than 12,000 new cases of cervical
cancer will be diagnosed this year, and more than 4,000 women will die of the
disease. Blacks are about 20 percent more likely to get cervical cancer, Hoyo
said, and about twice as likely to die from it as white women.
The
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HPV vaccination
for preteen boys and girls at age 11 or 12, before sexual activity begins.
The vaccines, given in three injections over a six-month period, cost about
$400 or more total.
In
developing Gardasil and Cervarix, scientists relied on studies to pinpoint
the strains of HPV most likely to lead to cancer. Studies were done on all
ethnicities, Hoyo said, noting that there may have been insufficient numbers
of black women in the research studies to pick up the differences in HPV
subtypes.
"There
has always been some skepticism about whether there are other strains that
are important, other than 16 and 18," she said. This study is not the first
to report the differences, she said.
The
findings, however, are not a reason for blacks not to get an HPV vaccine,
Hoyo said. Testing of vaccines that target additional HPV subtypes are under
way, and in time the problem may be solved, she added.
Research
presented at medical meetings should be viewed as preliminary until published
in a peer-reviewed journal.
SOURCES:
Cathrine Hoyo, Ph.D., M.P.H., associate professor, obstetrics and gynecology,
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.; Robert Morgan, M.D.,
co-director, gynecological oncology program, City of Hope Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Duarte, Calif.; abstract, presentation, American Association
for Cancer Research, International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer
Prevention Research, National Harbor, Md., Oct. 27 to 30, 2013
Gardasil Provides No Benefit: CDC Study
The recent Gardasil study by the CDC claims
that the vaccine has significantly reduced HPV infections. The authors’ claim
bears little resemblance to the study’s results. Here’s an analysis
demonstrating that, in reality, no conclusions can be drawn—that the study’s
results are inconsistent, based on non-matched samples, and mixed the groups
being compared.
Recently,
the mainstream news media was worked up about a study claiming that Gardasil
has proven to be effective in preventing HPV (humanpapillomavirus)
infections, and thereby, the implication that it will also prevent cervical
cancer. However, careful perusal of the study shows something entirely
different—that the vaccine provides no discernible benefit.
Lest
there be any doubt about the study’s claim, the title is “Reduction in Human
Papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence Among Young Women Following HPV Vaccine
Introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination
Surveys, 2003–2010″. Clearly, the point the authors wanted to get across is
that Gardasil, the HPV vaccine in question, works.
It
sounds outrageous to claim that a study with that title doesn’t live up to
its promise. However, the authors focused the spotlight on only a small
portion of their results to give that impression. When placed into proper
perspective, the only legitimate conclusion to be be drawn is that Gardasil
does not provide any benefit.
The study, financed by the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC) relied on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), an ongoing CDC group of
studies “to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children
in the United States.” The researchers of this study looked at data
from two sampling periods, 2003-2006, the “pre-vaccine era”, and 2007-2010,
the “post-vaccine” era, because vaccinations were started in 2007 (with a few
exceptions at the end of 2006).
The
vaccine is designed to prevent infections of four types of HPV: types 6 and
11, which cause genital warts, and types 16 and 18, which can cause cervical
cancer—though in the vast majority of cases, they are naturally healed by the
body and cause no known problems.
The
result that the authors and news media have heavily promoted is that the
14-19 year old age range saw a reduction between the two time periods of
11.5% to 5.1% in types 16 and 18 HPV infections. That does sound significant.
It seems to indicate that Gardasil has reduced the incidence of infection by
56 percent, a highly significant amount.
Different
Ages, Different Results
However,
by their own estimation, the sample size is too small to make any real
conclusions. Yet, that’s precisely what they did, as their title clearly
demonstrates! But the truth is significantly worse than that little slip. The
vaccine was not given only to 14-19 years olds, it was also given to young
women up through age 26. So what were the results in the age ranges of 20-24
and 25-29?
Ages 20-24 saw an infection rate increase from 18.5% to 19.9%—1.08 times more infections!
Ages 25-29 saw an infection rate increase from 11.8% to 13.1%—1.11 times more infections!
If the
Gardasil vaccine had worked as claimed, wouldn’t there have been an infection
reduction in those two age groups, too? Though they weren’t vaccinated as frequently,
many young women did get it. Therefore, if there’s a reduction in HPV
infections that can be attributed to the vaccine in 14-19 year olds, then
surely there would be a reduction in ages 20-29, albeit smaller since fewer
young women were vaccinated than teens. Instead, there was an increase!
Mixing Ages
No
information was provided about how long after vaccinations the interviews and
examinations were done. It appears that there was no consistency, that some
may have been interviewed 6 months after vaccination, while others could have
been interviewed 3 or 4 years later. For example, a girl might have been
vaccinated in early 2007 at age 16, but not interviewed until she was 20 in
2010. That would put her in a different age range.
A large
percentage of the girls who were in the 14-19 age group when vaccinated would
have been in the 20-24 age range when questioned by NHANES. So that would
also serve to decrease the percentage of 20-24 year olds infected with types
16 & 18 HPV—certainly not result in the increase this study shows. The
same logic can be used for the next age range, 25-29.
Therefore,
the groups are not discretely separated, as the authors would seem to imply.
Oversampled Group
Another
anomaly could explain the discrepancy between the results of girls aged 14-19
and those 20-29. The sampling done between 2007 and 2010 was different for
girls aged 14-19. According to the study:
To
increase the precision of estimates, NHANES oversampled certain subdomains.
In NHANES 1999–2006, Mexican Americans, blacks, low income white and others,
and adolescents aged 12–19 years were oversampled. In 2007–2010, Hispanics,
non-Hispanic blacks, and low income white and others were oversampled.
Because adolescents were not oversampled in 2007–2010, there was a reduced
number of individuals aged 14–19 years.
In the
2007-2010 timeframe, Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks, and low income people
were oversampled … except among adolescents! In other words, the groups were
not similar; they were intentionally made dissimilar. Did that make a
difference? Perhaps—but we do not know. What we do know is that the
researchers may have been comparing apples with oranges in teenaged girls
between the two timespans.
Researchers’ Conflict of Interest
So why didn’t the authors tell the
whole story? That seems quite obvous. They’re all CDC employees. The CDC has
been promoting Gardasil very heavily. They not only financed the study, their
own employees produced it. In an agency that was headed by Julie Gerberding,
who left to take a highly lucrative position as vice president of Merck’s
vaccine division, it isn’t difficult to see that no one who does anything
counter to the prevailing vaccines-for-everything-for-everyone is likely to
have a future with the CDC. As one research fellow with the agency stated onGlassDoor.ca:
Whether
you become an FTE (full time employee) depends exclusively on politics, not
on your hard-work and accomplishments.
The study that promotes the claim
that Gardasil has reduced HPV infections has done nothing of the sort. In
fact, it may provide better evidence for a contention that it has increased
infection rates. After all, only one of the three age groups involved
actually appeared to have a reduced rate of HPV infections. Let me clarify that I am not making that claim, as I do not
believe that this study comes close to demonstrating any valid conclusions.
However, such a claim would hold every bit as much validity as what the
authors concluded.
Summary
There
are four highly significant concerns with the results of this study:
The authors acknowledged that the
sample size was inadequate.
The results were anomalous. All of the
three age groups, 14-19, 20-24, and 25-29, should have had similar results.
That is, they should all have shown an increase or decrease in infection
rates. Yet they most assuredly did not.
The groups were not distinct from
each other, so that age ranges between vaccination and examination could
result in a subject starting out in one age range, but being examined after
entering the next age range.
The 14-19 age group was not
oversampled for the 2007-2010 timespan, which means that group is not
homologous with the 14-19 2003-2006 group.
THE AUTHORS ARE ALL EMPLOYED BY THE CDC, WHICH FINANCED
THE STUDY AND ACTIVELY PROMOTES THE GARDASIL VACCINE.
THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE PRESENTED THE RESULTS IN A HIGHLY
BIASED MANNER IS CLEAR. IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE STUDY WAS SPUN TO GIVE THE
IMPRESSION OF A CERTAIN RESULT, WITH LITTLE CONCERN FOR WHETHER THE DATA
ACTUALLY SUPPORTS IT.
IT WOULDN’T BE OUT OF LINE TO LABEL THE STUDY AS PSEUDO
SCIENCE OR JUNK SCIENCE.
HERE IS A COPY OF THE RESULTS PRESENTED BY THE STUDY:
http://samawomenshealth.wordpress.com
/ ( India )
http://www.aavp.es/
This site is in spanish. There are many free translation programs online, so
that the information here can be copy and pasted.
Why VAERS is a passive reporting system that the FDA
loves to quote Cynthia A. Janak November 17, 2013
I have been
researching a specific vaccine since February of 2007 and I have learned so
much about how the FDA, CDC and the other organizations like the ACIP like to
skew the data for their own purposes. It has gotten to the point that you can
no longer trust or believe in what they say. They have gotten to the point
where they will intentionally underreport the adverse events of any drug or
vaccine to suit the purpose of God knows who. Here are the facts in their own
words. At the end I will show you the impact this underreporting has on our
youth with the HPV vaccine. I will underscore the parts I feel are important
for you to remember.
"Aside from adverse events associated with specified vaccines (listed in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act), most reporting by health providers is voluntary." (1) "Although the FDA receives many adverse event reports, these probably represent only a fraction of the serious adverse events encountered by providers. A recent review article found that between 2% and 11% of hospital admissions could be attributed to adverse drug reactions. Only about 1% of serious events are reported to the FDA, according to one study." (1) "There are probably several reasons why some serious events are not reported to either the FDA or the manufacturer. First, when confronted with an unexpected outcome of treatment, physicians may not consider drug-induced or device-induced disease, but rather consider the event to be related to the course of the disease." (1) "Unfortunately, this may be due to the limited training medical students receive in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. A 1985 survey of US medical schools found that only 14% of them had required courses in core skills and principles of therapeutic decision making and clinical pharmacology. Of the remainder, 87% taught only a few hours of clinical pharmacology, and most of the teaching occurred in the early years of medical training." (1) "Another factor inhibiting physician reporting is that it is not an ingrained practice – it is not in the culture of US medicine to notify the FDA about adverse events or product problems." (1) "On the other hand, the FDA does not want providers to report every adverse reaction observed; this would not be practical for the practitioner or useful to the FDA. The FDA's goal is to increase reporting of serious events, not all adverse events. What should be reported are those cases in which the physician suspects that an FDA – regulated product was associated with a serious outcome – death, a life-threatening condition, initial or prolonged hospitalization, disability, or congenital anomaly, or when intervention was required to prevent permanent impairment or damage." (1) Accuracy of reports "VAERS is a passive surveillance system, and the large number of reports to VAERS increases the likelihood that some reports may not be adequately checked for accuracy, especially the less serious ones. Some reports to VAERS do not include full medical record documentation and may contain errors. The VAERS forms often have missing or incorrect data, including age, sex, vaccines administered, and adverse events." (2) Underreporting "Since VAERS is a passive system, it is inherently subject to underreporting. For example, a confidential study conducted by Connaught Laboratories, a vaccine manufacturer, indication that "a fifty-fold underreporting of adverse events" is likely. According to David Kessler, former commissioner of the FDA,"only about one percent of serious events [adverse drug reactions] are reported." Less serious vaccine adverse events (e.g., swelling, fever, or redness at the vaccination site) are more underreported than more serious vaccine adverse events (e.g., hospitalizations and death). The current analysis made no attempt to quantify underreporting due to age, type of adverse event, or other factor since only relative trends were utilized." (2) "Approximately 85% of the variation in mean hospitalization rates for children aged 0.1–0.5 years was accounted for on the basis of the number of vaccine doses. If the quantity and severity of adverse vaccine events is, in fact, related to the accumulated total number of vaccine doses, then methodology that includes the complete age-specific vaccination history of the patient might enhance the analysis. Furthermore, while vaccines may appear to be the causal factor leading to adverse vaccine events, other underlying patient medical conditions, including latent mitochondrial disease or vitamin deficiencies, may ultimately play a role. Some reports have postulated that environmental factors, including vaccine administration, can trigger an adverse reaction due to its various components or agents that depleted body resources and/or cause immune insults." (2) "Studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of administering multiple vaccine doses in a variety of combinations as recommended by CDC guidelines. Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths reported to VAERS. In addition, younger infants were significantly more likely than older infants to be hospitalized or die after receiving vaccines. Since vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive; universal vaccine recommendation must be supported by such studies." (2) What does all this mean to you? Simply stated is that the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) is a passive system and the physicians are not even trained properly or at any intensity as to the importance of sending a report of you or a loved one's adverse event to a drug or vaccine. It is not promoted to become an integral part of their practice. This is something that I believe any conscientious physician would want for their patients that rely on their knowledge with regards to the effectiveness of the medications and vaccines that they administer. I feel that because of this lack of training and promotion we have the reporting rate of only 1% of the physicians reporting into a system that would be instrumental in the safety of all vaccine functionality. The next interesting item that I found was that the FDA which is the agency that we trust to want the most accurate information possible to protect the safety of our loved ones does not even want all the adverse events to be reported. Now, I understand that some are mild like a slight fever, flulike symptoms that go away in a short period of time but what about all the other adverse events.
They only want
incidents "associated with a serious outcome – death, a life-threatening
condition, initial or prolonged hospitalization, disability, or congenital
anomaly, or when intervention was required to prevent permanent impairment or
damage." (1) When researching the different adverse events reported to
the VAERS database it seems like the list goes on forever. When you read all
the different events reported you would think that over half would be
considered serious but as you can see they are not worth the time of the FDA.
What I believe has been promoted by the FDA is a system that is grossly inadequate to ascertain the safety of any drug, vaccine or medical device. This has led to so many products that have been touted to be safe left on the market where I feel in reality are highly dangerous. This is how this applies to the HPV vaccines. I am going to reference the information about the Gardasil vaccine as the prime example of this underreporting and how it is used to promote the vaccine. In their documents they will use the present numbers as to how many individuals reported an adverse event to the VAERS data base. Presently, as of October 13, 2013, there have been 32,179 reports. They will insinuate this number as fact per the whole population of vaccines distributed. What they do not bring up is that this could only be 1% as they attest to as the amount that really reports. So what this gives us if you multiply this by 100% is in realty 3,217,900 has suffered an adverse event from the vaccine. This could also be on the low end because from my conversations with hundreds of parents and individuals over the years I can safely say that I believe that this is only the tip of the iceberg. They will also downplay the deaths that have been reported. Presently there have been 148 young people who have died with relation to this vaccine. If you use what they stated of 1% you really have 14,800 have died. The only problem that I see in this is that all the parents that I have spoken with have told me that the autopsy reports were inconclusive as to a cause so I believe that this number has the real possibility to be double if not triple the amount I have stated above. This in itself should be cause to remove this vaccine from distribution. I cringe and wonder and pray that when I read a news report of some young person suddenly dying for some unknown reason did not receive the HPV vaccine. Another way they will skew the real numbers is what they did for the reports to the FDA. You will hear often that the percentage of adverse events reported for the vaccine compared to the placebo was comparable. In the report to the FDA on September 11th, 2008 this is what the reporter wrote. "Reviewer's Comment: The proportions of subjects in each System Organ Class were comparable. The most common conditions reported were pharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and influenza. There was a higher proportion of subjects with abdominal pain in the Gardasil group (5.0%) as compared to the saline placebo group (2.7%)." (3) The reality of this statement with relation to table 79, New Medical Conditions After Day 1..., it is referencing is this. Out of 11,778 participants that received the Gardasil vaccination 8,628 (73.3%) reported a new medical history during the study. In the placebo group out of 9,686 participants 7,390 (76.3%) reported a new medical history during the study. So what the FDA says to you is that there was only a 3.0% difference between the vaccine group and the placebo group. If you look at this that is a small margin but if you look at the real numbers reported which is the 73.3% that is huge. Can you imagine that 3 out of 4 young people receiving this vaccine are expected to have a new medical condition when the real numbers are known and this is acceptable to the FDA, CDC and all the other organizations that use this data? It is because of what these organizations tell us that I can safely say that the HPV vaccine has the potential to be the worse vaccine ever created because by their own admission they promote the under reporting of adverse events, do not encourage doctors to report and omit vital statistics when promoting the safety of this vaccine to the public. How can this make you feel confident in the practices of the FDA? From what I have learned over the years I have a '0%' confidence level in regards to anything that they do. Here is another tasty tidbit. "Postlicensure safety data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink study, including data from >600,000 HPV4 doses administered, showed no statistically significant increased risk for the outcomes studied, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, stroke, venous thromboembolism, appendicitis, seizures, syncope, allergic reactions, and anaphylaxis (15). Postlicensure safety data from a manufacturer-sponsored study found no increased risk for outcomes such as anaphylaxis and venous thromboembolism; however, persons who were vaccinated with HPV4 were more likely to faint on the day they were vaccinated than another period in which vaccine was not administered (16)." (4) Once again they are referencing the differences between the vaccine and the placebo. So in essence what they are stating is correct that there is "no statistically significant increased risk." The real numbers tell the truth and this is what they do not want you to know. They also do not tell you what the other outcomes they studied were. This is how they skew the numbers to say what they want and technically they are not lying. The last item of interest is this. "Studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of administering multiple vaccine doses in a variety of combinations as recommended by CDC guidelines." (2) This sentence needs absolutely no explanation. So when you go to your doctor for your next well baby visit and he tells you they need this, this and this vaccine that day, you can safely tell them that in doing so they are violating recommended CDC guidelines where multiple vaccine studies have not been conducted. Also, if your school has a vaccine clinic and they decide to administer multiple vaccines to the children at once you can tell them the same thing and reference the document this came from. Now you know why so many children are suffering from various diseases and have Autism. The doctors are not trained and a study was not performed as to the safety of multiple vaccinations per recommended by the CDC guidelines. Will you be one more or one less individual hurt by the underreporting of adverse events which is promoted by the FDA? Think about it. I plan on being one less and will educate myself since it is not an ingrained practice for our doctors to do so. This is very sad. (1) Jama, June 2, 1993 – Vol 269, No. 21, page 2765 Introducing MEDWatch – Kessler (2) Human and Experimental Toxicology, 31(10) 1012–1021, DOI: 10.1177/0960327112440111, Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990–2010 (3) http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/081204 Clinical Review of Biologics License Application Supplement for Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant (Gardasil®) to extend indication for prevention of vaginal and vulvar cancers related to HPV types 16 and 18. Dated September 11, 2008, (4) Centers for Disease Control – Recommendations on the Use of Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Males – Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011, Weekly, December 23, 2011 / 60(50);1705-1708
Does the mainstream media slant the truth about the HPV
vaccines? Part 3 Cynthia A. Janak May 20, 2012
Here is part three to this series. I
hope you found the unbiased information in the first two interesting. At the
end of this series I will give you further . . .
Does the mainstream media slant the truth about the HPV
vaccines? Part 2 Cynthia A. Janak May 19, 2012
This is the continuation of my
response to Here Is How We Know Gardasil Has Not Killed 100 People, by
Matthew Herper. There is so much information available . . .
Does the mainstream media slant the truth about the HPV
vaccines? Part 1 Cynthia A. Janak May 17, 2012
I find mainstream media to be comical
because they slant the facts to suit their own agenda. You have these
proclaimed experts tout the benefits of the HPV . . .
HPV vaccines -- Do the risks outweigh the benefit?Cynthia A.
Janak April 27, 2012
Since February of 2007 I have had
this interest in finding out why the push for the HPV vaccines when there is
no epidemic of cervical cancer in the United . . .
Anaphylaxis and HPV vaccines, what do they have in
common? Cynthia A. Janak April 6, 2012
During the last several months I have
been researching anaphylaxis reactions and symptoms. The reason for this
interest is that back in the middle of December, . . .
HPV vaccine cocktail targets not only HPV Cynthia A.
Janak October 7, 2011
For over four years now I have been
researching how this vaccine works. I have wondered why did they use the
ingredients that they did and what repercussions . . .
Truth about Gardasil demands that the Department of
Justice investigate HPV vaccines Cynthia A.
Janak September 27, 2011
MERCK has made public their
"exclusion" criteria for the Gardasil HPV vaccine in documents
filed with ClinicalTrials.gov, for clinical trial #NCT01096134, a.k.a . . .
Talking about the HPV vaccine is now called fear
mongering and morally indefensible Cynthia A.
Janak September 21, 2011
The more the media reports the more
times I get to laugh at their statements. They have not and I do not think
that they will ever study the reports like I . . .
HPV studies -- Inclusion and exclusion roulette wheel Cynthia A.
Janak September 20, 2011
Well, I am at it again. I am asking
why the 11 year old Hispanic boy was included in the study. I was amazed at
what I found as to what is presently available . . .
HPV reports to FDA -- oversight,
errors and/or omission. That is the question. Cynthia A.
Janak September 19, 2011
In my article dated September 16th,
2011, I referenced an FDA document. "Clinical Review of Biologics
License Application Supplement for Human Papillomavirus . . .
HPV -- Let the safety challenges begin Cynthia A.
Janak September 17, 2011
This is just getting too good to be
true. We are now having people challenging other people over the safety of a
vaccine. I would have never believed in my . . .
Bachmann, HPV, and Perry -- Thank
you for bringing the HPV vaccines back into the spotlight Cynthia A. Janak September 16, 2011
I want to thank Michele Bachmann for
bringing up the fact that Governor Perry overstepped his authority with his
mandate. I also want to thank Governor Perry . . .
King of Texas, is he the victim of mistakes or bad
judgment? Cynthia A. Janak August 29, 2011
I really, really wanted to stay out
of the political arena but when the "King of Texas" Gov. Perry said
it was a "mistake" to mandate the HPV vaccine in
Texas . . .
Why do we get sick after vaccination or medication?
Cynthia A. Janak August 15, 2011
For the last several months I have
been trying to answer this question. I have been reading a lot of research
papers, etc. to find out my latest why? First, . . .
Truth About Gardasil ® is proud to announce the first
annual "Gardasil gathering of the Midwest" Cynthia A.
Janak July 23, 2011
I will be at this event and I am
looking forward to meeting all my Gardasil Girls and Boys. FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of . . .
The pro-vaccine rhetoric makes me sick Cynthia A.
Janak February 9, 2011
I have not written in over a year due
to my own experience with a doctor (which I now call snake oil salesmen) who
prescribed an antibiotic, I believe . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 7) Cynthia A. Janak July 29, 2010
For those of you who have come to
this article for the first time I would suggest that you start at the
beginning of this series. All the information that was . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 6) Cynthia A. Janak June 29, 2010
For those of you who have come to
this article for the first time I would suggest that you start at the
beginning of this series. All the information that was . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 5) Cynthia A. Janak June 21, 2010
The continuing saga of the HPV
vaccines approved by the FDA never ends. Today I am going to be answering the
question "After reporting my daughter's reactions . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 4) Cynthia A. Janak June 19, 2010
As I promised, I will be answering
the question "Why is my daughter so sick now when she was always so
healthy before the vaccination?" This question is
asked . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 3) Cynthia A. Janak June 16, 2010
For those of you who have come here
for the first time let me inform you as to why I am writing this series. I
was part of an international group of women and . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 2) Cynthia A. Janak June 12, 2010
As I promised I am going to address
the global concerns that were presented to the FDA and the question "My
daughter is now sick after the HPV vaccination and . . .
The truth about the HPV vaccines or what they do not
want you to know (Part 1) Cynthia A. Janak June 9, 2010
In my last article I mentioned that I
was part of an international group of women and we had a "listening
session" with the FDA and presented our findings, . . .
Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) in regards to Gardasil and Cervarix, double speak
Cynthia A. Janak June 6, 2010
This report just makes my blood boil
because of all the misinformation that they provide to make these vaccines
appear to be safe. The recommendations in this . . .
Vaccines are they safe? Proof is in the numbers
Cynthia A. Janak November 5, 2009
This is the question that has been
floating around all pro-vaccine, safe-vaccination and anti-vaccination groups
for a very, very long time. Today, I am going . . .
Pharma's hidden secrets revealed Cynthia A.
Janak October 18, 2009
I hope that I have your attention
because I am going to reveal what the medical establishment and Big Pharma
has hidden from the citizens of the world for over . . .
HPV emergency medical alert Cynthia A.
Janak September 30, 2009
Since February of 2007 I have
researched the HPV vaccines extensively. I have learned so much during this
time. Well, my most recent research has caused me to . . .
FDA - September 9, 2009: Vaccines and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee briefing information Cynthia A.
Janak September 11, 2009
The first document I am going to reference
is "Male indication for Gardasil" sponsored by Merck Research
Laboratories. The duration of this study is noted on . . .
The pandemic of harm Cynthia A.
Janak August 7, 2009
One of the things that has interested
me from the beginning is the sexual transmission of the Human Papillomavirus.
It has been referenced time and time again . . .
The question "Do vaccines cause brain
damage?" finally answered Cynthia A. Janak May 27,
2009
NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Leslie Botha 970-231-2008 leslie@holyhormones . . .
Can seizures kill? Yes, proof of how the Gardasil girlscould have
died Cynthia A. Janak April 20, 2009
The deaths of the Gardasil girls have
remained a mystery for some time now. Many of the parents of these Gardasil
girls do not have any closure because the . . .
The reality of the vaccine wars Cynthia A.
Janak April 18, 2009
In recent months we have been hearing
from the PhD's, MD's, Dr.'s and others in the medical community telling us
about the dangers of not vaccinating. They . . .
Mystery epidemic hitting the UK after HPV jab
Cynthia A. Janak April 14, 2009
Since September of 2008 a mystery
illness has struck the UK after the HPV jab Cervarix was implemented in a
school vaccine program. It has been reported in . . .
Does Autism exist? I say NO because it is brain damage! Cynthia A. Janak April 5, 2009
As many of my readers know I have been
focusing my attention on the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, manufactured in the
United States by Merck Pharmaceutical Co. A . . .
Gardasil Girls give the silent faces of autism a voice -- again
Cynthia A. Janak March 4, 2009
During the last few months I have not
been writing many articles because of my research into the causes of the
side-effects the Gardasil Girls are having. I . . .
Gardasil daily events or what the families have to say
Cynthia A. Janak December 11, 2008
Since I started to write about
Gardasil I have had the privilege and the honor to meet and correspond with
many, many families whose daughters have a new . . .
New Gardasil findings about clinical trials Cynthia A.
Janak December 8, 2008
In my article Gardasil Clinical
Trials — Placebo that I wrote July 23, 2008 I showed you Table 7. In that
table it referenced Study 018 and that this study had . . .
Gardasil trials update--"New Medical
Conditions" Cynthia A. Janak December 4, 2008
I found an interesting document on
the FDA website about my favorite topic, Gardasil. Subject: Clinical Review
of Biologics License Application Supplement . . .
Is Cervarix going to be the Gardasil for the UK? Cynthia A. Janak November 28, 2008
As many of you know I have been
writing about the side-effects of Gardasil for over a year and a half. The
emails that I have been receiving have been mainly . . .
Gardasil -- a different way of looking at the reactions
Cynthia A. Janak November 15, 2008
Merck in their infinite wisdom has
decided to make some comments on their Prescribing Information that they give
to the doctors. I have found this to be . . .
Truthfulness in reporting Cynthia A.
Janak September 6, 2008
When I started on this journey of
reporting about Gardasil, I knew that there would be some that would do their
best to discredit my findings. That is typical . . .
A father's struggle because of Gardasil Cynthia A.
Janak August 12, 2008
I received this letter from a father
whose daughter is having a severe reaction to the Gardasil vaccine. It is a
beautiful letter and deserves to be published . . .
Gardasil clinical trials --
Placebo Cynthia A. Janak July 23, 2008
When we as a people hear about
clinical studies and the word 'Placebo' comes up we think that it contains
nothing more than a solution of saline (salt water) or . . .
Gardasil -- doctor's story is 'no side-effects' Cynthia A.
Janak July 10, 2008
On March 20, 2008, I took my
perfectly healthy granddaughter for a check-up...she received a Gardasil
shot, which the doctor said "had no side effects"...6
days . . .
Gardasil tragedies -- Where
are the reports? Cynthia A. Janak July 3, 2008
Back in June of 2006, the FDA
released this statement. "Today is an important day for public health
and for women's health, and for our continued fight . . .
Are we over vaccinating our children -- Yes Cynthia A.
Janak June 5, 2008
On November 10th of 2007 I wrote
"The great vaccine cover-up a shocking report" in which I showed
the vaccine schedule for the United States child. In
this . . .
Gardasil reactions on the rise Cynthia A.
Janak May 13, 2008
In my last article about Gardasil the
numbers of reports are rising. When will we stop this? When will our
government take notice and launch a full . . .
Gardasil vaccine --
poison or cure Cynthia A. Janak April 6, 2008
Since writing my series on this
vaccine there has been one thing that has been bothering me. That is the
side-effects that are being reported by the people . . .
VAERS reporting -- is it accurate? Cynthia A.
Janak March 30, 2008
I have had people tell me that the
numbers that I have been updating in regards to the Gardasil vaccine are not
that bad considering the lives that will be . . .
Gardasil is becoming a living hell for many young women
Cynthia A. Janak March 28, 2008
Since writing my series on this
abomination to young women I have gotten many emails from many countries
around the world. The stories make me weep with a . . .
Vaccine safety physician form Cynthia A.
Janak March 13, 2008
I was given a form by an acquaintance
of mine for the doctor to fill out in regards to vaccinations. I found it to
be very well written and a must for every . . .
FDA and HPV: when did they know --
follow up Cynthia A. Janak December 20, 2007
In my article dated December 12th,
2007, I referenced the first 27 pages of the "Reclassification Petition
for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, Nested Polymerase . . .
Cynthia A. Janak December 13, 2007
Today I am going to give you real
stories from real people about their experiences with the dangerous wonder
drug Gardasil. The reason that I am doing this is . . .
FDA and HPV -- when did they know the truth? Cynthia A. Janak December 12, 2007
First, I want to say thank you to
everyone reading my articles. Your emails show me your curiosity and concern
about what is happening in the world today warms . . .
Gardasil -- my error is the smoking gun Cynthia A.
Janak December 11, 2007
What I want to do is say that the numbers
that I reported on in previous articles about the Gardasil vaccine were not
accurate. I based those numbers on the actual reports in the VAERS data base.
What I found today when I was checking on new reports I found reports stating
multiple patients. This is what I found after reading 15 pages and 144
reported events.
There are 57 reports in the data base that state multiple patients with adverse reactions. What this means is that the reported number is greater than first thought. The total that I came up with is staggering. But first I am going to give you an update. What I reported on November 11, 2007 taken from the National Vaccine Information Center. 4031 reported incidents 59 were considered life threatening 134 were hospitalized 694 had not recovered at the time of the report 81 are disabled at the time of the report 8 have died These numbers have increased as I knew they would. As of today, December 10, 2007 this is what has been reported. I added together HPV and HPV4. 4306 reported incidents + 2141 (newly found) = 6447 (see chart below) 71 were considered life threatening 173 were hospitalized 730 had not recovered at the time of the report 93 are disabled at the time of the report 10 have died One of the things that happened since my last report is that I received an email from an organization in Norway that is putting up a good fight against allowing the children of Norway to receive the dangerous vaccine Gardasil. They do not want their children to suffer the effects of this vaccine like we are allowing our children to suffer. It seems that they put the health of their children before profit. My hat goes off to Norway. If I ever get the chance I would love to visit Norway and get to know the people and the culture. Now to the scary part. What I have done is created a graph that will give you a base number for the 57 reports. Some of the numbers are going to be estimates based on what is presented in ..
The great vaccine cover-up a shocking report
Cynthia A. Janak November 10, 2007
I have had several responses to my
articles about Gardasil from around the world. This got me to thinking about
vaccines in general. Why are infants under the . . .
Australia: Let's give babies Gardasil vaccine shots
Cynthia A. Janak September 27, 2007
One of my dream vacations is to spend
a month in Australia and travel the country. As of today I am going to have
my doubts whether I will. At least, I will . . .
Gardasil emergency update Cynthia A.
Janak September 19, 2007
This article is to all you sheeple
who have daughters and who believe the lie of better health through chemistry
need to read this. Here is an update of the . . .
The Gardasil lies for profit Cynthia A. Janak August 25, 2007
I had hopes that with my last report
Merck and its affiliates would think twice about their Gardasil vaccine. I
was wrong. I am going to give you reports of . . .
Gardasil follow-up report: Medical alert Cynthia A.
Janak July 22, 2007
Last night I saw a commercial for
Gardasil. It was a nice commercial and very enticing for the vaccination. It
did cause me to wonder how our daughters were . . .
The great Gardasil vaccine cover-up Cynthia A.
Janak February 27, 2007
The World Health Organization (WHO)
is promoting this drug that has serious side effects. Here are some of the
reasons why. Did you know that 80% of cases . . .
Following
her December 4 episode, scores of publications went into PR mode in defense
of Big Pharma, launching vicious coordinated attacks on Couric for daring to
question the vaccine’s efficacy.
“Vaccine Disinformation: Katie
Couric on HPV and Jenny McCarthy on Autism,” the Washington Times
dutifully spewed out. “Has Couric Lost Her Cred on HPV?”
asked a writer at the Daily Beast, as if the TV personality ever had “cred”
on vaccines to begin with. And the Atlantic Wire did its part with a headline
that read, “Katie Couric Feeds the HPV
Vaccine ‘Controversy.’”
“We guess ABC will do anything to bring Katie out of its ratings hole, because the HPV vaccine has
been proven to be absolutely safe for girls,” the Wire wrote. According to
them, stories about people who died after receiving the vaccine mean it’s
“absolutely safe.”
The outraged publications, in addition to Gardasil manufacturer
Merck, advised their readers to look to the CDC and the FDA for their health
info – the same CDC that earlier this year memory holed (including on
Google’s cache system) pages dedicated to the history of the polio vaccine –
a vaccine “contaminated” with a
cancer-causing primate virus that
was distributed to some 10 to 30 million Americans. Why the CDC wouldn’t want
to display this information is anyone’s guess.
To the vaccine
advocates’ dismay, Couric also invited
Dr. Diane Harper, a professor at the University of Louisville and leading HPV
expert, to provide insight into why she did a complete 180 on the vaccine.
“Why
initially did you think this was such a positive development for cancer
prevention?” Couric asked.
“I was
very excited initially because I thought, ‘Yay! We have a vaccine. This could
be really important, especially in countries that don’t have any screening
with it,’” Harper said. “But then I started looking at what isn’t covered,
and I looked at the fact that Gardasil doesn’t last long enough to
prevent cervical cancer and
HPV infections are something that women continue to get throughout their
lifetime.”
Harper
continued: “The other thing that, in looking through CDC data as well as
other published data, is that HPV is most often sexually transmitted, but
between the age of birth and 11 years of age, 10 to 15 percent of these
children are already infected with these high risk types. So it isn’t that you’re
completely negative until you’re 11 years of age and then you’re at risk.
There is an underlying infection rate already that’s there.”
An
internationally recognized HPV expert actually speaking out on the dangers of
a vaccine? Make no mistake, this info was like high noon to the establishment
media vampires.
Here are
some additional links on how Gardasil is “absolutely safe” and Merck is to
trusted…not:
H/T Gaia-health.com
 |
Monday, December 23, 2013
Katie Couric Opened The HPV/Gardasil Pandora’s Box And Discussion; Now Maybe People Will Begin To Examine The Truth About This Vaccine, Its Questionable Value, Bottom Line Merchandising, Shoddy Testing And Meaningless Follow Up Data.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment