|
HPV Vaccines: A Human Rights Violation? The Same Issue In India and Inventing Diseases
To Sell Drugs
OCTOBER 1,
2013
By K Paul Stoller, MD*, FACHM
[ “Our good friend Ken Stoller, MD has kindly written an article
for SaneVax to distribute. The article is posted her - http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-human-rights-violation/”]
IN DR. STOLLER'S
OWN WORDS:
"... this
is no endorsement for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccines. In fact this is
about revealing that HPV vaccines were created for only one reason and it
wasn’t as a humanitarian effort to minimize cervical cancer.
It was created
by greed to create income for both a pharmaceutical company and USA
governmental agencies National Institutes of Health/Health and Human Services
(NIH/HHS) that owned the technology used in the vaccine under the cover of
doing something beneficial – a “greater good.”
The HPV vaccine
has less value than snake oil - at least snake oil is rich in Omega 3 EFAs,
and consuming snake oil won’t harm anyone, but the same cannot be said for
the HPV vaccine.
The HPV vaccine was never necessary and the
true interventions available for those who are concerned about preventing
cervical cancer have been suppressed."
CLEARLY, A MUST
READ ARTICLE.
HPV Vaccines: Science or ?
Cervical cancer, the second-most common cancer in young women,
is particularly prone to be found in the down trodden and in impoverished
countries. But this is no endorsement for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)
vaccines. In fact this is about revealing that HPV vaccines were created for
only one reason and it wasn’t as a humanitarian effort to minimize cervical
cancer. It was created by greed to create income for both a pharmaceutical
company and USA governmental agencies National Institutes of
Health/Health and Human Services (NIH/HHS) that owned the
technology used in the vaccine under the cover of doing something beneficial
– a “greater good.” The HPV vaccine has less value than snake oil – at
least snake oil is rich in Omega 3 EFAs, and consuming snake oil won’t harm
anyone, but the same cannot be said for the HPV vaccine. The HPV vaccine was
never necessary and the true interventions available for those who are
concerned about preventing cervical cancer have been suppressed.
Does HPV cause cervical cancer?
While a virus may almost always be a trigger for cancer on a
cellular/DNA level – it needs the environment, the internal milieu, to be
prepared correctly to allow the wildcat cells to proliferate. Because the
public doesn’t know this, it is easy for trusted authorities to impose fear
of the virus on the populace just as was done and is still done with polio.
It is a tried and true method of disinformation.
In the case of cervical cancer the field upon which it takes
hold must be deficient in certain vitamins, and without that deficiency it is
very unlikely cervical cancer will take hold.
While it may remain controversial which vitamins, or
combinations thereof hold the key, the point is this is about a nutritional
issue.
Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) is a phytochemical present in all
members of the cruciferous vegetable family including cabbage, broccoli,
Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, and kale. In a double-blind,
placebo-controlled study,[1] 30 patients with
biopsy-confirmed Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN),
also known as cervical dysplasia, II-III were randomized to
receive placebo or 200 or 400 mg oral I3C daily for 12 weeks.
None of the patients in the placebo group had complete
regression of CIN. In contrast, four of eight patients in the 200-mg/day
group and four of nine in the 400-mg/day group had complete regression of CIN
based on 12-week biopsy (400 mg/day, is equivalent to one-third of a head of
cabbage.)
Adequate Vitamin D levels need to be present as well, but the
point is cervical cancer is far more about malnutrition than an HPV virus.
The vitamin D connection is no surprise because adequate vitamin D levels are
required to have the immune system deal with viral infections and as most
cancer patients are vitamin D deficient, regardless of what cancer they have
a vitamin D/cervical cancer connection is a foregone conclusion.
Cigarette smoking, which is known to lower Vitamin D levels,
only adds to the risk of cervical cancer. The bottom-line for women to
understand is that an HPV infection alone is an insufficient cause of
cervical cancer. HPV is but only one risk factor along with cigarette
smoking. There is no direct link between HPV and cervical cancer. The vast
majority of women will get an HPV infection but they will not get cervical
cancer, but in malnourished women cervical cancer becomes a real risk. This
is about poverty and nutrition – that is the direct link and the primary
cause of cervical cancer.
Do HPV vaccines benefit
women’s health?
Those who care about a woman’s risk of cervical cancer would
do better to empower women everywhere and provide adequate nourishment, but
this isn’t about caring about or for women – this is just about profit
nothing less. Now, there has always been a pharmaceutical treatment for HPV
infections (except in the USA). [2] One
study showed that with just a ten day course of therapy with this extremely
benign drug (inosine pranobex or Isoprinosine), there was an almost 80%
elimination of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 in cervical cancer
(CIN I-III) and preinvasive cancer of the cervix and of those with recurrent
CIN or Ca in situ in the remaining part of the cervix who were infected with
(HPV).[3] This
study was published the same year the FDA fast tracked the HPV vaccine.
The vaccines cover HPV 16 & 18, responsible for being the
trigger for 70% of cervical cancers, but no one actually knows if the vaccine
prevents infection (let alone cancer) – all we know is they increase
antibodies to those two viral strains for an unspecified period of time. The
vaccines do not cover 16 other HPV strains that can trigger genital cancer
(31, 45, 33, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 26, 53, 66, 68, 73, 82). We do know
getting the vaccine actually increases the risk of getting carcinoma in situ
lesions from HPV strains not covered by the vaccine.[4]
Now this bears repeating, the FDA apparently knew the
vaccine actually increased cervical cancer risk by 40% in women who had
already been exposed to HPV and used magical thinking (no
scientific evidence) to deal with this problem by recommending approving the
vaccine for young girls hoping (I can only assume) they were never exposed –
but the evidence is that infants can be exposed during the birth process, and
since no testing of HPV serology is done before an HPV vaccine is given nor
is it required, the FDA’s decision was irrational until you understand they
were doing the bidding of not just Merck but the Health & Human Services
Department that owns patents connected to this vaccine and would benefit if
the vaccine became widely accepted.
Science or Subterfuge?
In other words, not only was the science behind this vaccine
not there, but evidence showed cancer risk increased significantly. The
fact that the NIH/HHS owned patents of the technology used in the vaccine,
which was licensed to Merck, had everything to do with how this dangerous
vaccine failed upward into approval and a fast-track. This is a total loss of
boundaries between corporation and state.
This is now about criminal activity. When the head of the
Merck vaccine division[5] (Julie
Gerberding) is the same person in charge of the CDC you have an unholy
alliance between corporation and state. The public and the world need to
understand that no scientific information coming from the NIH/CDC/FDA/HHS can
be trusted nor policies created from same. The loss of confidence in
these agencies is irrecoverable.
Any scientific publication that is authored by anyone coming
from or funded by someone either working for the government or a
pharmaceutical company can no longer be trusted.
Whether or not the subterfuge behind HPV vaccines
constitutes a violation of human rights deserves its own
discussion. Nevertheless, several States (USA) will allow 12 year olds to
receive this vaccine without parental consent.
But a 12 year old cannot enter into a contract anywhere in the
USA, so how could they possibly give informed consent for a vaccine?
Again, this aspect of the problem deserves international
attention if not international legal intervention, but that is not taking
place yet.
KP Stoller, MD* is President of the International Hyperbaric
Medical Association, a lifetime Fellow of the American College of
Hyperbaric Medicine, an Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor (AT Still
University SOMA), Chief of Hyperbaric Medicine – Amen Clinics, and was a
Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics for over two decades until he
resigned over their advocacy of mercury preservatives in vaccines. *these
above organizations/institutions are for identification purposes only.
References:
1.
Shannon J, Thomas DB, Ray RM, et al. Dietary risk
factors for invasive and in-situ cervical carcinomas in Bangkok, Thailand.
Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:691-699.
2. Jin L, Qi M, Chen
DZ, et al. Indole-3-carbinol prevents cervical cancer in human papilloma virus
type 16 (HPV16) transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 1999 Aug 15;59(16):3991-7.
3. Brot, C.
Jorgensen, N. R. Sorensen, O. H. The influence of smoking
on vitamin D status and calcium metabolism. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999
Dec; 53 (12): 920-6.
4. Ho GY, Kadish AS,
Burk RD, et al. HPV 16 and cigarette smoking as risk factors for high-grade
cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 1998;78:281-285.
5.
Palefsky JM, Holly EA. Molecular virology and
epidemiology of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers. Prev 1995;4:415-428.
6. Chen, P. Hu, P.
Xie, D. Qin, Y. Wang, F. Wang, H. Meta-analysis of vitamin
D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res
Treat. 2010 Jun; 121 (2): 469-77.
7.
Friedrich, M. Rafi, L. Mitschele, T. Tilgen, W. Schmidt,
W. Reichrath, J. Analysis of the vitamin D
system in cervical carcinomas, breast cancer and ovarian cancer.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003; 164239-46.
8. Garland, C. F.
Gorham, E. D. Mohr, S. B. Garland, F. C. Vitamin D for cancer
prevention: global perspective. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jul; 19 (7):
468-83.
9. Grant, W.
B. Does solar ultraviolet
irradiation affect cancer mortality rates in China?. Asian Pac J
Cancer Prev. 2007 Apr-Jun; 8 (2): 236-42.
10. Grant, W.
B. A meta-analysis of second
cancers after a diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer: additional evidence
that solar ultraviolet-B irradiance reduces the risk of internal cancers.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Mar; 103 (3-5): 668-74.
11. Grant, W. B.
Benefits of vitamin D in reducing the risk of cancer: Time to include vitamin
D in cancer treatment?. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2010 Summer; 8 (3): 81-8.
12.Grant, W. B. Relation between
prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and incidence of breast,
colorectal, and other cancers. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2010 May
12;
13.Grant, W. B. Cancer risk ecological study in Rhineland-Palatinate,
Germany, provides strong support for the ultraviolet B-vitamin D-cancer
hypothesis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2010 19 July 2010; 19 July
2010
14.Grant, W. B. Garland, C. F. The association of solar
ultraviolet B (UVB) with reducing risk of cancer: multifactorial ecologic
analysis of geographic variation in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates.
Anticancer Res. 2006 Jul-Aug; 26 (4A): 2687-99.
15. Hosono, S.
Matsuo, K. Kajiyama, H. Hirose, K. Suzuki, T. Kawase, T. Kidokoro, K.
Nakanishi, T. Hamajima, N. Kikkawa, F. Tajima, K. Tanaka, H.Association between
dietary calcium and vitamin D intake and cervical carcinogenesis among
Japanese women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr; 64 (4): 400-9.
16.Hrushesky, W. J. Sothern, R. B. Rietveld, W. J. Du
Quiton, J. Boon, M. E. Season, sun, sex, and
cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Aug; 14
(8): 1940-7.
17. Hrushesky, W. J.
Sothern, R. B. Rietveld, W. J. Du-Quiton, J. Boon, M. E. Sun exposure, sexual
behavior and uterine cervical human papilloma virus. Int J
Biometeorol. 2006 Jan; 50 (3): 167-73.
18.Ingraham, B. A. Bragdon, B. Nohe, A. Molecular basis of the
potential of vitamin D to prevent cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008
Jan; 24 (1): 139-49.
19.Lappe, J. M. Travers-Gustafson, D. Davies, K. M. Recker,
R. R. Heaney, R. P. Vitamin D and calcium
supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun; 85 (6): 1586-91.
20. Oplander, C.
Volkmar, C. M. Paunel-Gorgulu, A. van Faassen, E. E. Heiss, C. Kelm, M.
Halmer, D. Murtz, M. Pallua, N. Suschek, C. V. Whole body UVA irradiation
lowers systemic blood pressure by release of nitric oxide from intracutaneous
photolabile nitric oxide derivates. Circ Res. 2009 Nov 6; 105
(10): 1031-40.
21.Reinhold, U. Schmitz, B. Kurbacher, C. Nagel, W.
Schmidt, M. Malaisse, W. J. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in German
cancer patients. Oncology reports. 2008 Dec; 20 (6): 1539-43.
22. Seidler, A.
Hammer, G. P. Husmann, G. Konig, J. Krtschil, A. Schmidtmann, I. Blettner,
M. Cancer risk among
residents of Rhineland-Palatinate winegrowing communities: a cancer-registry
based ecological study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008; 312.
23. Shaykhiev, R.
Otaki, F. Bonsu, P. Dang, D. T. Teater, M. Strulovici-Barel, Y. Salit, J.
Harvey, B. G. Crystal, R. G. Cigarette smoking
reprograms apical junctional complex molecular architecture in the human
airway epithelium in vivo. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010 Sep 6;
24. Tsai HT, Tsai YM,
Yang SF, Wu KY, Chuang HY, Wu TN, Ho CK, Lin CC, Kuo YS, Wu MT. Lifetime cigarette smoke and second-hand smoke and
cervical intraepithelial neoplasm–a community-based case-control study.
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Apr; 105 (1): 181-8.
25. Villiotou, V.
Deliconstantinos, G. Nitric oxide,
peroxynitrite and nitroso-compounds formation by ultraviolet A (UVA)
irradiated human squamous cell carcinoma: potential role of nitric oxide in
cancer prognosis. Anticancer Res. 1995 May-Jun; 15 (3): 931-42.
26. Wei, L. Gravitt,
P. E. Song, H. Maldonado, A. M. Ozbun, M. A. Nitric oxide induces early
viral transcription coincident with increased DNA damage and mutation rates
in human papillomavirus-infected cells. Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 1; 69
(11): 4878-84.
[1] Bell MC,
Crowley-Nowick P, Bradlow HL, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of indole-3-carbinol
in the treatment of CIN. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:123-129.
[4] FDA’s VRBPAC
Background document, used at the May 18, 2006 meeting where Gardasil approval
was discussed:
Page 13, Title: “Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses
among Subgroups, 1. Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil to enhance
cervical disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with
vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination.” From
Page 14, Table 19, “Study 013: Analysis of efficacy against vaccine-relevant HPV types CIN 2/3 or worse among subjects who were PCR positive and/or seropositive for the relevant HPV type at day 1.” Table 19 shows that the efficacy rate for this group to be -33.7% ( A negative efficacy number means the vaccine led to an INCREASED risk of disease in the subgroups mentioned.) Page 22, Table 32. “Detailed Safety Population: Number (%) of subjects who reported systemic adverse reactions of 2% or greater in the 15 days following receipt of study vaccine.” Table 32 shows that the number of subjects reporting systemic adverse reactions was 3591. That is a percentage of 59.2% of the participants.
[5] Technically,
Gerberding did not become head of the Merck Vaccine Division until after she
resigned from the CDC.
PROFESSOR
B.M. HEGDE
I have known of many
tricks of the trade of the pharmaceutical lobby but not this one till very
recently although I had a hunch that this could be there. At the same time, I
am happy that there are people with some conscience pricking them before
death at least. Of late, when one opens any newspaper or journal there are
articles on a recent disease in children by name ADHD (Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder) and our pediatricians bend over backwards to make the
diagnosis and start our children on dangerous chemical drugs at that tender
age.
Now
comes the bombshell. American psychiatrist, Dr. Leon Eisenberg (87), made a
statement to a German magazine, Der Spiegel, a couple of months before his death
that ADHD is a fictitious disease which they put together for the benefit of
drug companies in the new disease classification in the American Psychiatry
Association’s DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Diseases).
In his
book, Inventing
Diseases, Professor Jerg
Blech, another German, gives a graphic description of hypertension having
been discovered as a disease needing drug treatment through the German plan ofWell Man clinics
in nice air-conditioned vans, with beautiful nurses, parked around Church
squares and shopping malls to give people a free check-up, a dangerous
activity when one feels healthy and happy.
Any one
that walks in becomes a patient. Actually, it was Leon Eisenberg who once
asked his new brilliant resident who is a patient? Pat came the reply: A
man/woman who sees any doctor becomes a patient! What rattled Leon further
was the answer to his second query: When does that person become normal
again? “Rarely ever, if ever, was the answer.” Maybe, this is the reason that
pricked his conscience.
There is
no proof or test to find out exactly what chemicals are “out of balance” in
the brain for ADHD or any other disorder. Most of those drugs are unnecessary
as they are known to provoke suicide and homicide. “Since that DMS conference
in 1968, Dr. Eisenberg's contribution to mental disease by invention and
committee consensus has resulted in drugging millions of children from
preschool age through high school. It is currently estimated that up to 20 %
of children from nursery school and kindergarten through high school and in
foster homes have been prescribed Ritalin.
Commonly prescribed for
kids “diagnosed” or better still, labelled with ADHD, Ritalin was tested a
little over a decade ago by the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). The BNL
study determined that Ritalin is pharmacologically similar to cocaine with
perhaps even worse brain damaging potential,” writes Mike Adams in his recent
blog.
Dr.
Irwin Savodnik, Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the UCLA School
of Medicine, was of the opinion that “the very vocabulary of psychiatry is
now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry.” This racket has
been going on ever since and has been able to get even health insurance to
cover their dark deeds.
Vaccination is another fertile ground for
the industry where most of what it sells has dubious value. Lead researcher,
Dr. Diane Harper, who was instrumental in creating Gardasil, and cervarix,
admitted back in 2009 that the vaccines were essentially useless and more
dangerous than the very conditions they were hailed as preventing and
treating? A 2009 article published by CBS News, in fact, which is still
available online, reveals the truth about these vaccines.
One particular quote, which was pulled out,
using the Wayback Machine, reveals that both Gardasil and Cervarix do nothing
to prevent cervical cancer, which is their primary claim to fame. “The rate
of serious adverse events [from Gardasil] is on a par with the death rate of
cervical cancer,” admitted Dr. Harper at that time, refuting a pro-Gardasil
piece published by Slate. “Gardasil has been associated with at least as many
serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing
each year.”
Dr. Harper dropped a bombshell when she told
reporters that the public health benefit of getting vaccinated with Gardasil
“is nothing,” adding the vaccine has led to “no reduction in cervical
cancers.” She quickly withdrew her statements saying the media has distorted
her story, almost on the lines of Indian politicians!
Dr. Harper went on to admit that deaths from
Gardasil had been underreported by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), which has given the illusion that the vaccine is somehow
safe. The vast majority of HPV infections resolve themselves on their own
within a year and nearly all of them within two years. She also admitted that
an extremely small number of people experience symptoms from infection.
Millions of young girls and now even boys, some as young as nine years old,
have received the vaccine since 2006. Some of what she said then is still on
line.
Recently,
Dr. Puliyal from New Delhi, an expert in this field, exposed the myth of
another childhood vaccine, the pentavalent vaccine. But that does not seem to
stir the conscience of our greedy powers that be! When I just retired as Vice-Chancellor
of Manipal University in 2003, the Deputy Commissioner of Udupi district
wanted me to retract an article of mine on polio dangers for malnourished
children, which information had, by then, even entered the British
Pharmacopoeia. As I refused to do that, he made my colleagues in the
university release a paper statement that “I had forgotten my medicine and
people should not give heed to my article as the whole university was fully
with the government in vaccinating even the malnourished children!” They
obliged him, I cannot but pity those statements and our commitment to truth
in medical science.
We can
go on and on till the cows come home on the fraud in medical research but I
highly recommend the following article in the Atlantic
Magazine of November 20th,
2010 by Davis Freedman on the important topic: Lies,
Damned Lies and Medical Research. The article is a result of a long
interview with Professor John PA Ioannidis of Stanford University, who has
been pioneering the work to expose these frauds successfully. He is a much
respected member of the American medical scene.
“Honesty is the best policy when there is money in it.” — Mark
Twain.
(The writer is a cardiologist and former Vice-Chancellor
of Manipal University. His email: hegdebm@gmail.com)
 |
Monday, October 7, 2013
HPV Vaccines: A Human Rights Violation? The Same Issue In India and Inventing Diseases To Sell Drugs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment